Commerce Casino offering L.A. Poker Classic satellites
- Commerce Casino offering L.A. Poker Classic satellites
- Commerce Casino - Commerce, CA - Yelp
- The Commerce Casino & Hotel
- Casinos Near Commerce Casino
- Casino City: Your Casino Directory
- Bell Gardens, Commerce, Hawaiian Gardens facing dire ...
- The Commerce Casino & Hotel
- Commerce, CA Home
- Commerce Casino - 2021 All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go ...
- Commerce Casino Review by Casino City
casino in city of commerce
casino in city of commerce - win
Timeline of Trump's Russia Connections from KGB Cultivation to United State President
The Russia Mafia is part and parcel of Russian intelligence.
Russia is a mafia state. That is not a metaphor. Putin is head of the Mafia. So the fact that they have deep ties to Donald Trump is deeply disturbing.
Trump conducted FIVE completely private meetings and conferences with Putin, and has gone to great lengths to prevent literally anyone, even people in his administration, from learning what was discussed.
According to an ex-KGB spy...Russia has been cultivating Trump as an asset for 40 years.
Trump was first compromised by the Russians in the 80s. In 1984, the Russian Mafia began to use Trump
real estate to launder money.
In 1984, David Bogatin —
a convicted Russian mobster and close ally of
Semion Mogilevich, a major Russian mob boss — met with Trump in Trump Tower right after it opened. Bogatin bought five condos from Trump at that meeting.
Those condos were later seized by the government, which claimed they were used to launder money for the Russian mob.
“During the ’80s and ’90s, we in the U.S. government repeatedly saw a pattern by which criminals would use condos and high-rises to launder money,” says Jonathan Winer, a deputy assistant secretary of state for international law enforcement in the Clinton administration. “It didn’t matter that you paid too much, because the real estate values would rise, and it was a way of turning dirty money into clean money. It was done very systematically, and it explained why there are so many high-rises where the units were sold but no one is living in them.” When Trump Tower was built,
as David Cay Johnston reports in The Making of Donald Trump, it was only the second high-rise in New York that accepted anonymous buyers.
In 1987,
the Soviet ambassador to the United Nations, Yuri Dubinin, arranged for Trump and his then-wife, Ivana, to enjoy an all-expense-paid trip to Moscow to consider business prospects.
A short while later he made his first call for the dismantling of the NATO alliance. Which would benefit Russia.
At the beginning of 1990 Donald Trump owed a combined $4 billion to more than 70 banks, with $800 million personally guaranteed by his own assets, according to Alan Pomerantz, a lawyer whose team led negotiations between Trump and 72 banks to restructure Trump’s loans. Pomerantz was hired by Citibank.
Interview with Pomerantz Trump agreed to pay the bond lenders 14% interest, roughly 50% more than he had projected, to raise $675 million. It was the biggest gamble of his career. Trump could not keep pace with his debts. Six months later, the Taj defaulted on interest payments to bondholders as his finances went into a tailspin.
In July 1991, Trump’s Taj Mahal filed for bankruptcy.
So he bankrupted a casino? What about Ru...
The Trump Taj Mahal casino broke anti-money laundering rules 106 times in its first year and a half of operation in the early 1990s,
according to the IRS in a 1998 settlement agreement.
The casino repeatedly failed to properly report gamblers who cashed out $10,000 or more in a single day, the government said."The violations date back to a time when the Taj Mahal was the preferred gambling spot for Russian mobsters living in Brooklyn, according to federal investigators who tracked organized crime in New York City. They also occurred at a time when the Taj Mahal casino was short on cash and on the verge of bankruptcy." ....ssia
So by the mid 1990s Trump was then at a low point of his career. He defaulted on his debts to a number of large Wall Street banks and was overleveraged. Two of his businesses had declared bankruptcy, the Trump Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City and the Plaza Hotel in New York, and the money pit that was the Trump Shuttle went out of business in 1992. Trump companies would ultimately declare Chapter 11 bankruptcy two more times.
Trump was $4 billion in debt after his Atlantic City casinos went bankrupt. No U.S. bank would touch him. Then foreign money began flowing in through
Deutsche Bank.
The
extremely controversial Deutsche Bank. The
Nazi financing,
Auschwitz building,
law violating,
customer misleading,
international currency markets manipulating,
interest rate rigging,
Iran &
others sanctions violating,
Russian money laundering, salvation of Donald J. Trump.
The
agreeing to a $7.2 billion settlement with with the U.S. Department of Justice over its sale and pooling of toxic mortgage securities and causing the 2008 financial crisis bank.
The
appears to have facilitated more than half of the $2 trillion of suspicious transactions that were flagged to the U.S. government over nearly two decades bank.
The
embroiled in a $20b money-laundering operation, dubbed the Global Laundromat. The launders money for Russian criminals with links to the Kremlin, the old KGB and its main successor, the FSB bank.
That bank.
Three minute video detailing Trump's debts and relationship with Deutsche Bank In 1998,
Russia defaulted on $40 billion in debt, causing the ruble to plummet and Russian banks to close. The ensuing financial panic sent the country’s oligarchs and mobsters scrambling to find a safe place to put their money. That October, just two months after the Russian economy went into a tailspin,
Trump broke ground on his biggest project yet.
Directly across the street from the United Nations building.
Russian Linked-Deutsche Bank arranged to lend hundreds of millions of dollars to finance Trump’s construction of a skyscraper next to the United Nations.
Construction got underway in 1999.
Units on the tower’s priciest floors were quickly snatched up by individual buyers from the former Soviet Union, or by limited liability companies connected to Russia.
“We had big buyers from Russia and Ukraine and Kazakhstan,” sales agent Debra Stotts told Bloomberg. After Trump World Tower opened, Sotheby’s International Realty teamed up with a Russian real estate company to make a big sales push for the property in Russia. The “tower full of oligarchs,” as Bloomberg called it, became a model for Trump’s projects going forward. All he needed to do, it seemed, was slap the Trump name on a big building, and high-dollar customers from Russia and the former Soviet republics were guaranteed to come rushing in.
New York City real estate broker Dolly Lenz told USA TODAY she sold about 65 condos in Trump World at 845 U.N. Plaza in Manhattan to Russian investors, many of whom sought personal meetings with Trump for his business expertise.
“I had contacts in Moscow looking to invest in the United States,” Lenz said. “They all wanted to meet Donald. They became very friendly.”Lots of Russian and Eastern European Friends. Investing lots of money. And not only in New York. Miami is known as a hotspot of the ultra-wealthy looking to launder their money from overseas.
Thousands of Russians have moved to Sunny Isles.
Hundreds of ultra-wealthy former Soviet citizens bought Trump properties in South Florida.
People with really disturbing histories investing millions and millions of dollars.
Igor Zorin offers a story with all the weirdness modern Miami has to offer: Russian cash, a motorcycle club named after Russia’s powerful special forces and a condo tower branded by Donald Trump.
Thanks to its heavy Russian presence, Sunny Isles has acquired the nickname “Little Moscow.” From an interview with a Miami based Siberian-born realtor... “Miami is a brand,” she told me as we sat on a sofa in the building’s huge foyer. “People from all over the world want property here.” Developers were only putting up luxury properties because they “know that the crisis has not affected people with money,”
Most of her clients are Russian—there are now three direct flights per week between Moscow and Miami—and increasing numbers are moving to Florida after spending a few years in London first. “It’s a money center, and it’s a lot easier to get your money there than directly to the US, because of laws and tax issues,” she said. “But after your money has been in London for a while, you can move it to other places more easily.”
In the 2000s, Trump turned to licensing deals and trademarks, collecting a fee from other companies using the Trump name. This has allowed Trump to distance himself from properties or projects that have failed or encountered legal trouble and provided a convenient workaround to help launch projects, especially in Russia and former Soviet states, which bear Trump’s name but otherwise little relation to his general business.
Enter
Bayrock Group, a development company and key Trump real estate partner during the 2000s. Bayrock partnered with Trump in 2005 and invested an incredible amount of money into the Trump organization under the legal guise of licensing his name and property management. Bayrock was run by two investors:
Felix Sater, a Russian-born mobster who served a year in prison for stabbing a man in the face with a margarita glass during a bar fight, pleaded guilty to racketeering as part of a mafia-driven "pump-and-dump" stock fraud and then escaped jail time by becoming a highly valued government informant.
He was an important figure at Bayrock, notably with the Trump SoHo hotel-condominium in New York City, and has said under oath that he represented Trump in Russia and subsequently billed himself as a senior Trump advisor, with an office in Trump Tower.
He is a convict who became a govt cooperator for the FBI and other agencies. He grew up with Micahel Cohen --Trump's disbarred former "fixer" attorney.
Cohen's family owned El Caribe, which was a mob hangout for the Russian Mafia in Brooklyn. Cohen had ties to Ukrainian oligarchs through his in-laws and his brother's in-laws. Felix Sater's father had ties to the Russian mob.
Tevfik Arif, a Kazakhstan-born former "Soviet official" who drew on bottomless sources of money from the former Soviet republic.
Arif graduated from the Moscow Institute of Trade and Economics and worked as a Soviet trade and commerce official for 17 years before moving to New York and founding Bayrock. In 2002, after meeting Trump, he moved Bayrock’s offices to Trump Tower, where he and his staff of Russian émigrés set up shop on the twenty-fourth floor.
Arif was offering him a 20 to 25 percent cut on his overseas projects, he said, not to mention management fees. Trump said in the deposition that Bayrock’s Tevfik Arif “brought the people up from Moscow to meet with me,”and that he was teaming with Bayrock on other planned ventures in Moscow. The only Russians who are likely have the resources and political connections to sponsor such ambitious international deals are the corrupt oligarchs.
In 2005, Trump told The Miami Herald “The name has brought a cachet to certain areas that wouldn’t have had it,” Dezer said Trump’s name put Sunny Isles Beach on the map as a classy destination — and
the Trump-branded condo units sold “10 to 20 percent higher than any of our competitors, and at a faster pace.”“We didn’t have any foreclosures or anything, despite the crisis.” In a 2007 deposition that was part of his
unsuccessful defamation lawsuit against reporter Timothy O’Brien Trump testified "that Bayrock was working their international contacts to complete Trump/Bayrock deals in Russia, Ukraine, and Poland. He testified that
“Bayrock knew the investors” and that “this was going to be the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Moscow, Kiev, Istanbul, et cetera, and Warsaw, Poland.” In 2008,
Donald Trump Jr. gave the following statement to the “Bridging U.S. and Emerging Markets Real Estate” conference in Manhattan:
“[I]n terms of high-end product influx into the United States, Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets; say in Dubai, and certainly with our project in SoHo and anywhere in New York. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.” In July 2008,
Trump sold a mansion in Palm Beach for $95 million to Dmitry Rybolovlev, a Russian oligarch. Trump had purchased it four years earlier for $41.35 million. The sale price was nearly $54 million more than Trump had paid for the property. This was the height of the recession when all other property had plummeted in value. Must be nice to have so many Russian oligarchs interested in giving you money.
In 2013,
Trump went to Russia for the Miss Universe pageant “financed in part by the development company of a Russian billionaire Aras Agalarov.… a Putin ally who is sometimes called the ‘Trump of Russia’ because of his tendency to put his own name on his buildings.” He met with many oligarchs.
Timeline of events. Flight records show how long he was there.
Video interview in Moscow where Trump says "...China wanted it this year. And Russia wanted it very badly." I bet they did.
Also in 2013, Federal agents busted an “ultraexclusive, high-stakes, illegal poker ring” run by Russian gangsters out of Trump Tower. They operated card games, illegal gambling websites, and a global sports book and laundered more than $100 million. A condo directly below one owned by Trump reportedly served as HQ for a
“sophisticated money-laundering scheme” connected to Semion Mogilevich.
In 2014,
Eric Trump told golf reporter James Dodson that the Trump Organization was able to expand during the financial crisis because
“We don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia. I said, 'Really?' And he said, 'Oh, yeah. We’ve got some guys that really, really love golf, and they’re really invested in our programmes. We just go there all the time.’” A 2015
racketeering case against Bayrock, Sater, and Arif, and others, alleged that: “for most of its existence it [Bayrock] was substantially and covertly mob-owned and operated,” engaging “in a pattern of continuous, related crimes, including mail, wire, and bank fraud; tax evasion; money laundering; conspiracy; bribery; extortion; and embezzlement.” Although the lawsuit does not allege complicity by Trump, it claims that Bayrock exploited its joint ventures with Trump as a conduit for laundering money and evading taxes. The lawsuit cites as a “Concrete example of their crime, Trump SoHo, [which] stands 454 feet tall at Spring and Varick, where it also stands monument to spectacularly corrupt money-laundering and tax evasion.”
In 2016, the Trump Presidential Campaign
was helped by Russia.
(I don't have the presidential term sourced yet. I'll post an update when I do. I'm sure you probably remember most of them...sigh. TY to the main posters here. Obviously I'm standing on your shoulders having taken a lot of the information or articles from here).
submitted by Well__Sourced to Keep_Track [link] [comments]
Playboy going public: Porn, Gambling, and Cannabis
NEW INFO 5 Results from share redemption are posted. Less than .2% redeemed. Very bullish as investors are showing extreme confidence in the future of PLBY.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/playboy-mountain-crest-acquisition-corp-120000721.html NEW INFO 4 Definitive Agreement to purchase 100% of Lovers brand stores announced 2/1.
https://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/Playboy+%28MCAC%29+Confirms+Deal+to+Acquire+Lovers/17892359.html NEW INFO 3 I bought more on the dip today. 5081 total. Price rose AH to $12.38 (2.15%)
NEW INFO 2 Here is the full webinar.
https://icrinc.zoom.us/rec/play/9GWKdmOYumjWfZuufW3QXpe_FW_g--qeNbg6PnTjTMbnNTgLmCbWjeRFpQga1iPc-elpGap8dnDv8Zww.yD7DjUwuPmapeEdP?continueMode=true&tk=lEYc4F_FkKlgsmCIs6w0gtGHT2kbgVGbUju3cIRBSjk.DQIAAAAV8NK49xZWdldRM2xNSFNQcTBmcE00UzM3bXh3AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA&uuid=WN_GKWqbHkeSyuWetJmLFkj4g&_x_zm_rtaid=kR45-uuqRE-L65AxLjpbQw.1611967079119.2c054e3d3f8d8e63339273d9175939ed&_x_zm_rhtaid=866 NEW INFO 1 Live merger webinar with PLBY and MCAC on Friday January 29, 2021 at 12:00 NOON EST link below
https://mcacquisition.com/investor-relations/press-release-details/2021/Playboy-Enterprises-Inc.-and-Mountain-Crest-Acquisition-Corp-Participate-in-SPACInsider-ICR-Webinar-on-January-29th-at-12pm-ET/default.aspx Playboy going public: Porn, Gambling, and Cannabis !!!WARNING READING AHEAD!!! TL;DR at the end. It will take some time to sort through all the links and read/watch everything, but you should.
In the next couple weeks, Mountain Crest Acquisition Corp is taking Playboy public. The existing ticker MCAC will become PLBY. Special purpose acquisition companies have taken private companies public in recent months with great success. I believe this will be no exception. Notably, Playboy is profitable and has skyrocketing revenue going into a transformational growth phase.
Porn - First and foremost, let's talk about porn. I know what you guys are thinking. “Porno mags are dead. Why would I want to invest in something like that? I can get porn for free online.” Guess what? You are absolutely right. And that’s exactly why Playboy doesn’t do that anymore. That’s right, they eliminated their print division. And yet they somehow STILL make money from porn that people (see: boomers) pay for on their website through PlayboyTV, Playboy Plus, and iPlayboy. Here’s the thing: Playboy has international, multi-generational name recognition from porn. They have content available in 180 countries. It will be the only publicly traded adult entertainment (porn) company. But that is not where this company is going. It will help support them along the way. You can see every Playboy magazine through iPlayboy if you’re interested. NSFW links below:
https://www.playboy.com/ https://www.playboytv.com/ https://www.playboyplus.com/ https://www.iplayboy.com/ Gambling - Some of you might recognize the Playboy brand from gambling trips to places like Las Vegas, Atlantic City, Cancun, London or Macau. They’ve been in the gambling biz for decades through their casinos, clubs, and licensed gaming products. They see the writing on the wall. COVID is accelerating the transition to digital, application based GAMBLING. That’s right. What we are doing on Robinhood with risky options is gambling, and the only reason regulators might give a shit anymore is because we are making too much money. There may be some restrictions put in place, but gambling from your phone on your couch is not going anywhere. More and more states are allowing things like Draftkings, poker, state ‘lottery” apps, hell - even political betting. Michigan and Virginia just ok’d gambling apps. They won’t be the last. This is all from your couch and any 18 year old with a cracked iphone can access it. Wouldn’t it be cool if Playboy was going to do something like that? They’re already working on it. As per CEO Ben Kohn who we will get to later, “...the company’s casino-style digital gaming products with Scientific Games and Microgaming continue to see significant global growth.” Honestly, I stopped researching Scientific Games' sports betting segment when I saw the word ‘omni-channel’. That told me all I needed to know about it’s success.
“Our SG Sports™ platform is an enhanced, omni-channel solution for online, self-service and retail fixed odds sports betting – from soccer to tennis, basketball, football, baseball, hockey, motor sports, racing and more.”
https://www.scientificgames.com/ https://www.microgaming.co.uk/ “This latter segment has become increasingly enticing for Playboy, and it said last week that it is considering new tie-ups that could include gaming operators like PointsBet and 888Holdings.”
https://calvinayre.com/2020/10/05/business/playboys-gaming-ops-could-get-a-boost-from-spac-purchase/ As per their SEC filing:
“Significant consumer engagement and spend with Playboy-branded gaming properties around the world, including with leading partners such as Microgaming, Scientific Games, and Caesar’s Entertainment, steers our investment in digital gaming, sports betting and other digital offerings to further support our commercial strategy to expand consumer spend with minimal marginal cost, and gain consumer data to inform go-to-market plans across categories.”
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1803914/000110465921005986/tm2034213-12_defm14a.htm#tMDAA1 They are expanding into more areas of gaming/gambling, working with international players in the digital gaming/gambling arena, and a Playboy sportsbook is on the horizon.
https://www.playboy.com/read/the-pleasure-of-playing-with-yourself-mobile-gaming-in-the-covid-era Cannabis - If you’ve ever read through a Playboy magazine, you know they’ve had a positive relationship with cannabis for many years. As of September 2020, Playboy has made a major shift into the cannabis space. Too good to be true you say? Check their website. Playboy currently sells a range of CBD products. This is a good sign. Federal hemp products, which these most likely are, can be mailed across state lines and most importantly for a company like Playboy, can operate through a traditional banking institution. CBD products are usually the first step towards the cannabis space for large companies. Playboy didn’t make these products themselves meaning they are working with a processor in the cannabis industry. Another good sign for future expansion. What else do they have for sale? Pipes, grinders, ashtrays, rolling trays, joint holders. Hmm. Ok. So it looks like they want to sell some shit. They probably don’t have an active interest in cannabis right? Think again:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/javierhasse/2020/09/24/playboy-gets-serious-about-cannabis-law-reform-advocacy-with-new-partnership-grants/?sh=62f044a65cea “Taking yet another step into the cannabis space, Playboy will be announcing later on Thursday (September, 2020) that it is launching a cannabis law reform and advocacy campaign in partnership with National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), Last Prisoner Project, Marijuana Policy Project, the Veterans Cannabis Project, and the Eaze Momentum Program.”
“According to information procured exclusively, the three-pronged campaign will focus on calling for federal legalization. The program also includes the creation of a mentorship plan, through which the Playboy Foundation will support entrepreneurs from groups that are underrepresented in the industry.” Remember that CEO Kohn from earlier? He wrote this recently:
https://medium.com/naked-open-letters-from-playboy/congress-must-pass-the-more-act-c867c35239ae Seems like he really wants weed to be legal? Hmm wonder why? The writing's on the wall my friends. Playboy wants into the cannabis industry, they are making steps towards this end, and we have favorable conditions for legislative progress.
Don’t think branding your own cannabis line is profitable or worthwhile? Tell me why these 41 celebrity millionaires and billionaires are dummies. I’ll wait.
https://www.celebstoner.com/news/celebstoner-news/2019/07/12/top-celebrity-cannabis-brands/ Confirmation: I hear you. “This all seems pretty speculative. It would be wildly profitable if they pull this shift off. But how do we really know?” Watch this whole video:
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/playboy-ceo-telling-story-female-154907068.html Man - this interview just gets my juices flowing. And highlights one of my favorite reasons for this play. They have so many different business avenues from which a catalyst could appear. I think paying attention, holding shares, and options on these staggered announcements over the next year is the way I am going to go about it. "There's definitely been a shift to direct-to-consumer," he (Kohn) said. "About 50 percent of our revenue today is direct-to-consumer, and that will continue to grow going forward.” “Kohn touted Playboy's portfolio of both digital and consumer products, with casino-style gaming, in particular, serving a crucial role under the company's new business model. Playboy also has its sights on the emerging cannabis market, from CBD products to marijuana products geared toward sexual health and pleasure.” "If THC does become legal in the United States, we have developed certain strains to enhance your sex life that we will launch," Kohn said.
https://cheddar.com/media/playboy-goes-public-health-gaming-lifestyle-focus Oh? The CEO actually said it? Ok then. “We have developed certain strains…” They’re already working with growers on strains and genetics? Ok. There are several legal cannabis markets for those products right now, international and stateside. I expect Playboy licensed hemp and THC pre-rolls by EOY. Something like this:
https://www.etsy.com/listing/842996758/10-playboy-pre-roll-tubes-limited?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=pre+roll+playboy&ref=sr_gallery-1-2&organic_search_click=1 Maintaining cannabis operations can be costly and a regulatory headache. Playboy’s licensing strategy allows them to pick successful, established partners and sidestep traditional barriers to entry. You know what I like about these new markets? They’re expanding. Worldwide. And they are going to be a bigger deal than they already are with or without Playboy. Who thinks weed and gambling are going away? Too many people like that stuff. These are easy markets. And Playboy is early enough to carve out their spot in each. Fuck it, read this too:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimosman/2020/10/20/playboy-could-be-the-king-of-spacs-here-are-three-picks/?sh=2e13dcaa3e05 Numbers: You want numbers? I got numbers. As per the company’s most recent SEC filing:
“For the year ended December 31, 2019, and the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Playboy’s historical consolidated revenue was $78.1 million and $101.3 million, respectively, historical consolidated net income (loss) was $(23.6) million and $(4.8) million, respectively, and Adjusted EBITDA was $13.1 million and $21.8 million, respectively.”
“In the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Playboy’s Licensing segment contributed $44.2 million in revenue and $31.1 million in net income.”
“In the ninth months ended September 30, 2020, Playboy’s Direct-to-Consumer segment contributed $40.2 million in revenue and net income of $0.1 million.”
“In the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Playboy’s Digital Subscriptions and Content segment contributed $15.4 million in revenue and net income of $7.4 million.”
They are profitable across all three of their current business segments.
“Playboy’s return to the public markets presents a transformed, streamlined and high-growth business. The Company has over $400 million in cash flows contracted through 2029, sexual wellness products available for sale online and in over 10,000 major retail stores in the US, and a growing variety of clothing and branded lifestyle and digital gaming products.”
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1803914/000110465921005986/tm2034213-12_defm14a.htm#tSHCF Growth: Playboy has massive growth in China and massive growth potential in India. “In China, where Playboy has spent more than 25 years building its business, our licensees have an enormous footprint of nearly 2,500 brick and mortar stores and 1,000 ecommerce stores selling high quality, Playboy-branded men’s casual wear, shoes/footwear, sleepwear, swimwear, formal suits, leather & non-leather goods, sweaters, active wear, and accessories. We have achieved significant growth in China licensing revenues over the past several years in partnership with strong licensees and high-quality manufacturers, and we are planning for increased growth through updates to our men’s fashion lines and expansion into adjacent categories in men’s skincare and grooming, sexual wellness, and women’s fashion, a category where recent launches have been well received.” The men’s market in China is about the same size as the entire population of the United States and European Union combined. Playboy is a leading brand in this market. They are expanding into the women’s market too. Did you know CBD toothpaste is huge in China? China loves CBD products and has hemp fields that dwarf those in the US. If Playboy expands their CBD line China it will be huge. Did you know the gambling money in Macau absolutely puts Las Vegas to shame? Technically, it's illegal on the mainland, but in reality, there is a lot of gambling going on in China.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/javierhasse/2020/10/19/magic-johnson-and-uncle-buds-cbd-brand-enter-china-via-tmall-partnership/?sh=271776ca411e “In India, Playboy today has a presence through select apparel licensees and hospitality establishments. Consumer research suggests significant growth opportunities in the territory with Playboy’s brand and categories of focus.” “Playboy Enterprises has announced the expansion of its global consumer products business into India as part of a partnership with Jay Jay Iconic Brands, a leading fashion and lifestyle Company in India.” “The Indian market today is dominated by consumers under the age of 35, who represent more than 65 percent of the country’s total population and are driving India’s significant online shopping growth. The Playboy brand’s core values of playfulness and exploration resonate strongly with the expressed desires of today’s younger millennial consumers. For us, Playboy was the perfect fit.” “The Playboy international portfolio has been flourishing for more than 25 years in several South Asian markets such as China and Japan. In particular, it has strategically targeted the millennial and gen-Z audiences across categories such as apparel, footwear, home textiles, eyewear and watches.”
https://www.licenseglobal.com/industry-news/playboy-expands-global-footprint-india It looks like they gave COVID the heisman in terms of net damage sustained: “Although Playboy has not suffered any material adverse consequences to date from the COVID-19 pandemic, the business has been impacted both negatively and positively. The remote working and stay-at-home orders resulted in the closure of the London Playboy Club and retail stores of Playboy’s licensees, decreasing licensing revenues in the second quarter, as well as causing supply chain disruption and less efficient product development thereby slowing the launch of new products. However, these negative impacts were offset by an increase in Yandy’s direct-to-consumer sales, which have benefited in part from overall increases in online retail sales so far during the pandemic.” Looks like the positives are long term (Yandy acquisition) and the negatives are temporary (stay-at-home orders).
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1803914/000110465921006093/tm213766-1_defa14a.htm This speaks to their ability to maintain a financially solvent company throughout the transition phase to the aforementioned areas. They’d say some fancy shit like “expanded business model to encompass four key revenue streams: Sexual Wellness, Style & Apparel, Gaming & Lifestyle, and Beauty & Grooming.” I hear “we’re just biding our time with these trinkets until those dollar dollar bill y’all markets are fully up and running.” But the truth is these existing revenue streams are profitable, scalable, and rapidly expanding Playboy’s e-commerce segment around the world.
"Even in the face of COVID this year, we've been able to grow EBITDA over 100 percent and revenue over 68 percent, and I expect that to accelerate going into 2021," he said. “Playboy is accelerating its growth in company-owned and branded consumer products in attractive and expanding markets in which it has a proven history of brand affinity and consumer spend.”
Also in the SEC filing, the
Time Frame:
“As we detailed in the definitive proxy statement, the SPAC stockholder meeting to vote on the transaction has been set for February 9th, and, subject to stockholder approval and satisfaction of the other closing conditions, we expect to complete the merger and begin trading on NASDAQ under ticker PLBY shortly thereafter,” concluded Kohn.
The Players: Suhail “The Whale” Rizvi (HMFIC), Ben “The Bridge” Kohn (CEO), “lil” Suying Liu & “Big” Dong Liu (Young-gun China gang). I encourage you to look these folks up. The real OG here is Suhail Rizvi. He’s from India originally and Chairman of the Board for the new PLBY company. He was an early investor in Twitter, Square, Facebook and others. His firm, Rizvi Traverse, currently invests in Instacart, Pinterest, Snapchat, Playboy, and SpaceX. Maybe you’ve heard of them. “Rizvi, who owns a sprawling three-home compound in Greenwich, Connecticut, and a 1.65-acre estate in Palm Beach, Florida, near Bill Gates and Michael Bloomberg, moved to Iowa Falls when he was five. His father was a professor of psychology at Iowa. Along with his older brother Ashraf, a hedge fund manager, Rizvi graduated from Wharton business school.” “Suhail Rizvi: the 47-year-old 'unsocial' social media baron: When Twitter goes public in the coming weeks (2013), one of the biggest winners will be a 47-year-old financier who guards his secrecy so zealously that he employs a person to take down his Wikipedia entry and scrub his photos from the internet. In IPO, Twitter seeks to be 'anti-FB'” “Prince Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia looks like a big Twitter winner. So do the moneyed clients of Jamie Dimon. But as you’ve-got-to-be-joking wealth washed over Twitter on Thursday — a company that didn’t exist eight years ago was worth $31.7 billion after its first day on the stock market — the non-boldface name of the moment is Suhail R. Rizvi. Mr. Rizvi, 47, runs a private investment company that is the largest outside investor in Twitter with a 15.6 percent stake worth $3.8 billion at the end of trading on Thursday (November, 2013). Using a web of connections in the tech industry and in finance, as well as a hearty dose of good timing, he brought many prominent names in at the ground floor, including the Saudi prince and some of JPMorgan’s wealthiest clients.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/08/technology/at-twitter-working-behind-the-scenes-toward-a-billion-dollar-payday.html Y’all like that Arab money? How about a dude that can call up Saudi Princes and convince them to spend? Funniest shit about I read about him: “Rizvi was able to buy only $100 million in Facebook shortly before its IPO, thus limiting his returns, according to people with knowledge of the matter.” Poor guy :(
He should be fine with the 16 million PLBY shares he's going to have though :)
Shuhail also has experience in the entertainment industry. He’s invested in companies like SESAC, ICM, and Summit Entertainment. He’s got Hollywood connections to blast this stuff post-merger. And he’s at least partially responsible for that whole Twilight thing. I’m team Edward btw.
I really like what Suhail has done so far. He’s lurked in the shadows while Kohn is consolidating the company, trimming the fat, making Playboy profitable, and aiming the ship at modern growing markets.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-twitter-ipo-rizvi-insight/insight-little-known-hollywood-investor-poised-to-score-with-twitter-ipo-idUSBRE9920VW20131003 Ben “The Bridge” Kohn is an interesting guy. He’s the connection between Rizvi Traverse and Playboy. He’s both CEO of Playboy and was previously Managing Partner at Rizvi Traverse. Ben seems to be the voice of the Playboy-Rizvi partnership, which makes sense with Suhail’s privacy concerns. Kohn said this:
“Today is a very big day for all of us at Playboy and for all our partners globally. I stepped into the CEO role at Playboy in 2017 because I saw the biggest opportunity of my career. Playboy is a brand and platform that could not be replicated today. It has massive global reach, with more than $3B of global consumer spend and products sold in over 180 countries. Our mission – to create a culture where all people can pursue pleasure – is rooted in our 67-year history and creates a clear focus for our business and role we play in people’s lives, providing them with the products, services and experiences that create a lifestyle of pleasure. We are taking this step into the public markets because the committed capital will enable us to accelerate our product development and go-to-market strategies and to more rapidly build our direct to consumer capabilities,” said Ben Kohn, CEO of Playboy.
“Playboy today is a highly profitable commerce business with a total addressable market projected in the trillions of dollars,” Mr. Kohn continued, “We are actively selling into the Sexual Wellness consumer category, projected to be approximately $400 billion in size by 2024, where our recently launched intimacy products have rolled out to more than 10,000 stores at major US retailers in the United States. Combined with our owned & operated ecommerce Sexual Wellness initiatives, the category will contribute more than 40% of our revenue this year. In our Apparel and Beauty categories, our collaborations with high-end fashion brands including Missguided and PacSun are projected to achieve over $50M in retail sales across the US and UK this year, our leading men’s apparel lines in China expanded to nearly 2500 brick and mortar stores and almost 1000 digital stores, and our new men’s and women’s fragrance line recently launched in Europe. In Gaming, our casino-style digital gaming products with Scientific Games and Microgaming continue to see significant global growth. Our product strategy is informed by years of consumer data as we actively expand from a purely licensing model into owning and operating key high-growth product lines focused on driving profitability and consumer lifetime value. We are thrilled about the future of Playboy. Our foundation has been set to drive further growth and margin, and with the committed capital from this transaction and our more than $180M in NOLs, we will take advantage of the opportunity in front of us, building to our goal of $100M of adjusted EBITDA in 2025.”
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201001005404/en/Playboy-to-Become-a-Public-Company Also, according to their Form 4s, “Big” Dong Liu and “lil” Suying Liu just loaded up with shares last week. These guys are brothers and seem like the Chinese market connection. They are only 32 & 35 years old. I don’t even know what that means, but it's provocative.
https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1832415.htm https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mountain-crest-acquisition-corp-ii-002600994.html Y’all like that China money?
“Mr. Liu has been the Chief Financial Officer of Dongguan Zhishang Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd., a regional designer, manufacturer and distributor of LED lights serving commercial customers throughout Southern China since November 2016, at which time he led a syndicate of investments into the firm. Mr. Liu has since overseen the financials of Dongguan Zhishang as well as provided strategic guidance to its board of directors, advising on operational efficiency and cash flow performance. From March 2010 to October 2016, Mr. Liu was the Head of Finance at Feidiao Electrical Group Co., Ltd., a leading Chinese manufacturer of electrical outlets headquartered in Shanghai and with businesses in the greater China region as well as Europe.”
Dr. Suying Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mountain Crest Acquisition Corp., commented, “Playboy is a unique and compelling investment opportunity, with one of the world’s largest and most recognized brands, its proven consumer affinity and spend, and its enormous future growth potential in its four product segments and new and existing geographic regions. I am thrilled to be partnering with Ben and his exceptional team to bring his vision to fruition.”
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201001005404/en/Playboy-to-Become-a-Public-Company These guys are good. They have a proven track record of success across multiple industries. Connections and money run deep with all of these guys. I don’t think they’re in the game to lose.
I was going to write a couple more paragraphs about why you should have a look at this but really the best thing you can do is read this SEC filing from a couple days ago. It explains the situation in far better detail. Specifically, look to page 137 and read through their strategy. Also, look at their ownership percentages and compensation plans including the stock options and their prices. The financials look great, revenue is up 90% Q3, and it looks like a bright future.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1803914/000110465921005986/tm2034213-12_defm14a.htm#tSHCF I’m hesitant to attach this because his position seems short term, but I’m going to with a warning because he does hit on some good points (two are below his link) and he’s got a sizable position in this thing (500k+ on margin, I think). I don’t know this guy but he did look at the same publicly available info and make roughly the same prediction, albeit without the in depth gambling or cannabis mention. You can also search reddit for ‘MCAC’ and very few relevant results come up and none of them even come close to really looking at this thing.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gOvAd6lebs452hFlWWbxVjQ3VMsjGBkbJeXRwDwIJfM/edit?usp=sharing “Also, before you people start making claims that Playboy is a “boomer” company, STOP RIGHT THERE. This is not a good argument. Simply put. The only thing that matters is Playboy’s name recognition, not their archaic business model which doesn’t even exist anymore as they have completely repurposed their business.”
“Imagine not buying $MCAC at a 400M valuation lol. Streetwear department is worth 1B alone imo.”
Considering the ridiculous Chinese growth as a lifestyle brand, he’s not wrong.
Current Cultural Significance and Meme Value: A year ago I wouldn’t have included this section but the events from the last several weeks (even going back to tsla) have proven that a company’s ability to meme and/or gain social network popularity can have an effect. Tik-tok, Snapchat, Twitch, Reddit, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter. They all have Playboy stuff on them. Kids in middle and highschool know what Playboy is but will likely never see or touch one of the magazines in person. They’ll have a Playboy hoodie though. Crazy huh? A lot like GME, PLBY would hugely benefit from meme-value stock interest to drive engagement towards their new business model while also building strategic coffers. This interest may not directly and/or significantly move the stock price but can generate significant interest from larger players who will.
Bull Case: The year is 2025. Playboy is now the world leader pleasure brand. They began by offering Playboy licensed gaming products, including gambling products, direct to consumers through existing names. By 2022, demand has skyrocketed and Playboy has designed and released their own gambling platforms. In 2025, they are also a leading cannabis brand in the United States and Canada with proprietary strains and products geared towards sexual wellness. Cannabis was legalized in the US in 2023 when President Biden got glaucoma but had success with cannabis treatment. He personally pushes for cannabis legalization as he steps out of office after his first term. Playboy has also grown their brand in China and India to multi-billion per year markets. The stock goes up from 11ish to 100ish and everyone makes big gains buying somewhere along the way.
Bear Case: The United States does a complete 180 on marijuana and gambling. President Biden overdoses on marijuana in the Lincoln bedroom when his FDs go tits up and he loses a ton of money in his sports book app after the Fighting Blue Hens narrowly lose the National Championship to Bama. Playboy is unable to expand their cannabis and gambling brands but still does well with their worldwide lifestyle brand. They gain and lose some interest in China and India but the markets are too large to ignore them completely. The stock goes up from 11ish to 13ish and everyone makes 15-20% gains.
TL;DR: Successful technology/e-commerce investment firm took over Playboy to turn it into a porn, online gambling/gaming, sports book, cannabis company, worldwide lifestyle brand that promotes sexual wellness, vetern access, women-ownership, minority-ownership, and “pleasure for all”. Does a successful online team reinventing an antiquated physical copy giant sound familiar? No options yet, shares only for now. $11.38 per share at time of writing. My guess? $20 by the end of February. $50 by EOY. This is not financial advice. I am not qualified to give financial advice. I’m just sayin’ I would personally use a Playboy sports book app while smoking a Playboy strain specific joint and it would be cool if they did that. Do your own research. You’d probably want to start here:
WARNING - POTENTIALLY NSFW - SEXY MODELS AHEAD - no actual nudity though https://s26.q4cdn.com/895475556/files/doc_presentations/Playboy-Craig-Hallum-Conference-Investor-Presentation-11_17_20-compressed.pdf Or here:
https://www.mcacquisition.com/investor-relations/default.aspx Jimmy Chill: “Get into any SPAC at $10 or $11 and you are going to make money.”
STL;DR: Buy MCAC. MCAC > PLBY couple weeks. Rocketship. Moon.
Position: 5000 shares. I will buy short, medium, and long-dated calls once available.
submitted by jeromeBDpowell to SPACs [link] [comments]
My 2021 Portfolio
Albeit a week late, I want to share my 2021 portfolio for documentation purposes and for whoever is interested. I aimed to balance risk in this portfolio with some growth names and legacy plays. Down to brass tacks, I am putting my money in the highest quality companies (in my view) across a diverse set of industries I find attractive. Some of these names are overvalued in the short term. However, I have realized I am not in the business of beating Wall Street’s pricing, but would rather hold high-quality companies that I believe will grow faster that the market in the long term. In other words, I am totally fine paying a short-term premium for growth and quality. Below is a summary of the portfolio and big picture reasoning behind each investment. I'm definitely open to any feedback.
Company | Ticker | Entry Price | Exposure |
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF | ARKG | $93.26 | 6.60% |
CrowdStrike | CRWD | $211.82 | 11.78% |
Disney | DIS | $181.18 | 10.53% |
Enphase Energy | ENPH | $175.47 | 7.98% |
Evolution Gaming Group | EVVTY | $101.02 | 12.77% |
Facebook | FB | $273.16 | 11.05% |
Redfin | RDFN | $68.63 | 10.41% |
Teladoc | TDOC | $199.96 | 9.60% |
Sea Ltd | SE | $199.05 | 14.09% |
Waste Connections | WCN | $102.57 | 5.19% |
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (BATS: ARKG) - Invests in companies advancing genomics. The companies held in ARKG may develop, produce or enable: CRISPR, Targeted Therapeutics, Bioinformatics, Molecular Diagnostics, Stem Cells, Agricultural Biology.
- Innovative industry. Since 2003 the cost to sequence a human genome has dropped from nearly $3bn to less than $1,000. ARK believes that as costs continue to drop, genomic sequencing will become a standard of care in oncology. It will introduce more science into healthcare decision making, enable personalized medicine, and accelerate drug discovery. ARK estimates that genomic sequencing revenues will grow 43% at an annual rate, from $3.5bn last year to $21bn in 2024.
- Cathie Wood. She’s a beast stock picker. Out of all the ETFs she runs, her closest competitor trailed by 60%. Her worst ETF still doubled investors' money. Her strategy is to make investments into companies that she considers incredibly transformational and she has seen success doing it.
CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) - Cybersecurity technology company that provides endpoint security, threat intelligence, and cyber attack response services.
- Best in class technology. Remember about a week ago a bunch of Russian hackers breached SolarWinds? The same hackers also tried to hack CrowdSrike at the same time but were unsuccessful. I’ve wandered on to a bunch of cybersecurity forums, and the general consensus is CrowdStrike has developed the best cybersecurity solution by miles. CRWD is the undisputed leader in cybersecurity.
- “Pick-and-shovel” investment into the world’s increasing digitization. Even in the absence of COVID, cybersecurity remains a key component of the world’s increasing digitization as cyberthreats have been an ongoing issue from the onset of the internet. In the last decade we have seen a bunch of hacks where companies have exposed sensitive customer information. It seems companies are just starting to realize the importance of cybersecurity.
Disney (NYSE: DIS) - Worldwide entertainment company that you all are probably familiar with.
- Reopening trade. In 2019, parks generated 45% of total operating income for DIS. Full reopening and attendance in parks will be slow, but certainly benefit DIS when it happens. The company has been executing on several other segments in the meantime (i.e. streaming). It has proved competitive, increasing the margin of safety if parks take longer to reopen.
- Fast-growing streaming division. DIS has proved agile as it successfully launched a streaming service, Disney+, that has already gained 86mn+ subscribers which was the company’s original 5 year target. This is promising as it shows management can adapt to rapidly changing technology trends.
Enphase Energy (NASDAQ: ENPH) - Designs and manufactures software-driven home energy solutions that span solar generation, home energy storage and web-based monitoring and control.
- Shift to clean energy; ENPH emerging as market leader. Going into 2021, sentiments towards solar have been at an all time high. This trend is expected to continue, especially after the Georgia run-off results. Solar firms are expected to benefit from extended tax incentives on both the consumer and producer ends.
- Technological advantage. ENPH has developed the industry leading solution and is rapidly taking market share from its primary competitor, SolarEdge. Pricing reflects this, but it's expected to continue. Among key competitors, Enphase has been one of the lowest cost producers. Its low-cost structure is a major contributing factor to its improving margins.
Evolution Gaming Group (OTC: EVVTY) - Swedish company that develops, produces, markets and licenses integrated B2B live casino solutions for gaming operators.
- Early mover advantage. Evolution’s lack of competition enables it to rapidly grow in new markets and create a loyal customer base, with high switching costs. The company has effectively grown EBITA margins from 41.6% in 1Q18 to 64.8% in 3Q20. Margin expansion is expected to continue.
- Massive untapped markets. Europe is estimated to be around $2.5bn (EVVTY has 50% market share), Asian market is ~15x the size of Europe (150% YoY growth for EVVTY in Asia). North America’s market is ~$210mn, a 42% increase YoY, with NJ and PA the only states currently operating (NY looks promising). Management thinks the US will be the largest in the long-term.
- Undetected from Wall Street. Evolution has almost no analyst coverage in the US and very minimal coverage in Europe, presenting opportunity for additional growth as institutional money managers recognize this opportunity and draw attention to the stock. Additionally, Evolution has a founder-led management team that is highly aligned with shareholders (mgmt owns over 30% of the stock).
Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) - Enables people to connect through devices. It’s products include Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp and Oculus.
- Zuck. It’s not a question of who is the next Jobs/Bezos/Gates/Zuck, because Zuck is super young. He has a history of being able to execute: IG acquisition / transition from desktop to mobile / denying multiple acquisition opportunities in his twenties.
- Undervalued. FB is the cheapest among the FAANG stocks, yet has some of the highest growth rates. This is mainly because of its continuous political scandals. With Trump out of office, I think FB has a chance to stay out of trouble and start to realize higher multiples. The antitrust lawsuit is not a threat imo, it is actually an opportunity. If the govt forces FB to break up, we would get shares in the spin-offs, which would be valued at a higher multiple than FB. For example, if Instagram spun off from FB and traded at the same multiple as SNAP, Instagram’s market cap would be larger than FB’s.
Redfin Corporation (NASDAQ: RDFN) - Provides residential real estate brokerage services.
- Digitization of Real Estate (i.e. “iBuying”). Technology in RE is moving from being informational to transactional. Redfin’s iBuying service is dubbed “RedfinNow.” The service basically buys homes from sellers looking for a quick and convenient sale (close deals within 10-30 days). This segment isn’t profitable yet as it is just getting started, but promising as the management adapts to technology trends.
- Inter-US Migration and housing outlook. People are moving out of the cities because of COVID / trying to avoid taxes / etc. which increases demand for Redfin’s services. With interest rates extremely low (and no expectation for them to increase), homebuying demand should continue to grow.
- RDFN most attractively valued compared to Z and OPEN, with the most upside potential given its market cap ~$7bn. Some are predicting RDFN might start offering rental services as well. RDFN has the best LT margin potential.
Teladoc Health (NYSE: TDOC) - Provides virtual healthcare services on a B2B basis to its clients and provides services to consumers directly and through channel partners.
- Competitive positioning in industry ripe for disruption. Healthcare is a huge market yet to be significantly disrupted. COVID has accelerated this disruption. Providers who were once opposed to telemedicine now realize its benefits and several regulatory changes are promising for telemedicines growth potential. Medicare and other government-sponsored coverage is expected to include telemedicine benefits, increasing TDOC’s TAM.
- Livongo acquisition. From the consumer POV, this will increase access to healthcare at a lower cost. Teladoc will have access to a larger amount of data it can interpret to refine its services and monetization strategies.
Sea Ltd (NYSE: SE) - Digital entertainment, electronic commerce, and digital financial services. The Company operates three business segments: Garena, Shopee, and SeaMonkey. The Company’s digital entertainment business, Garena, is a global game developer and publisher with a presence in Southeast Asia, Taiwan, and Latin America. Garena provides access to mobile and personal computer online games. Shopee provides users with a shopping environment that is supported by integrated payment, logistics, fulfillment, and other value-added services. SeaMonkey business is a digital financial services provider. SeaMonkey offers e-wallet services, payment processing, credit related digital financial offerings, and other financial products.
- Diversified consumer internet company with market-leading position. Sea caters to Southeast Asia and Taiwan, providing its online gaming, e-commerce, and payment platforms. Shopee has overtaken competitors, it is widening its market share lead. ESports is a rapidly growing market (15.7% YoY to $1.1bn in 2020) and Sea is outpacing market growth.
- Pay for quality. The best companies keep going up for years in a row, and I think Sea is in the early stages of being classified as such a company. It’s worth $100bn but has effectively proved its ability to identify opportunities and expand business lines.
- Still early stages of developing its consumer banking business, so we get the security of a bigger, established company with upside for an additional, lucrative business line such as fintech.
Waste Connections Inc. (NYSE: WCN) - Waste services company that provides non-hazardous waste collection, transfer, disposal and recycling services.
- Recession resilient; re-opening trade. The waste management industry is recession resilient, it will always be around.
- Non-hazardous waste collection. With a progressive government likely to push climate initiatives, recycling and non-hazardous waste collection are likely to benefit on the back end.
- WCN has a large moat; there isn’t much of a competitive threat the way the industry operates. Management’s strategy is to generally only spend what FCF is available. This enables the company to make acquisitions while handling its debt load. Great for stable growth.
P.S. I have two other accounts - one with about 40 growth stocks and another with about 10 big names / ETFs. However, this portfolio has the largest allocation for 2021. My first time trying a more concentrated approach.
submitted by bull_doze to investing [link] [comments]
TEKKORP DIGITAL (TEKK): Unsung Hero of the Casino/Gaming SPAC World. Stellar Team!
TEKKORP DIGITAL (TEKK) is a NASDAQ-listed blank check company created to acquire and unlock the value of businesses poised for growth in the
digital media, sports, entertainment, leisure and/or gaming ecosystems, by coupling transformative expertise with access to the deepest, most liquid public capital markets in the world.
287.5M Trust; Jefferies / Macquarie Capital (runners) IPOed 10/21/2020 2021-0204 Near NAV: $10.62 https://www.tekkorpdigital.com/ S-1 Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1822027/000121390020028479/fs12020_tekkorpdigitalacq.htm Team and Board of Directors: Matthew Davey — Chief Executive Officer and Director Mr. Davey has over 25 years of experience within the digital media, sports, entertainment, leisure and gaming ecosystems. CEO of
SG Digital, the Digital Division of
Scientific Games Corp. Oversaw seven acquisitions
OpenBet, Cryptologic/Chartwell; PokerStars and Intercasino Robin Chhabra — President Mr. Chhabra has been at the forefront of corporate acquisition activity within the digital gaming landscape for over a decade. Mr. Chhabra’s M&A experience is extensive and covers multiple global geographies across the digital gaming value chain and includes the following:
TSG/Flutter Entertainment;
TSG/Sky Betting and Gaming Eric Matejevich — Chief Financial Officer Mr. Matejevich is a seasoned gaming executive with extensive experience in both the online gaming and traditional casino industries. Interim-CEO of
Ocean Casino Resort (formerly
Revel Casino), CFO of NYX. CFO of
Resorts International Holdings; COO -
Atlantic Club Casino. Led acquisition of
Harrah’s Entertainment and
Caesars Entertainment. VP of High Yield Research for
Merrill Lynch.
Morris Bailey — Chairman Mr. Bailey has been a leader in turning around Atlantic City, Mr. Bailey partnered with two of the largest digital gaming companies in the world,
PokerStars, part of the
Stars Group, and
DraftKings. In 2010, Mr. Bailey bought
Resorts Atlantic City. Signed an agreement with
Mohegan Sun to manage the day-to-day operations of the casino. Established a platform to engage in online gaming by partnering with
PokerStars, now part of the $24 billion
Flutter Entertainment. Resorts announced deals with
DraftKings and
SBTech to open a sportsbook on-property and online.
Tony Rodio — Director Nominee Mr. Rodio has nearly four decades of experience in the gaming industry. CEO and director of
Caesars Entertainment Corporation. President, CEO and a director of
Tropicana Entertainment. Exec positions at
Trump Marina Hotel Casino,
Harrah’s Entertainment,
Atlantic City Hilton Casino Resort and
Penn National Gaming.
Marlon Goldstein — Director Nominee Mr. Goldstein is a licensed attorney with nearly 20 years of experience in the gaming space. Exec VP, Chief Legal Officer -
The Stars Group. Exec VP, Corporate Development and General Counsel of
TSG. Participated in numerous M&A transactions and capital markets offerings at TSG:
TSG/Flutter Merger,
TSG/Fox Bet;
TSG/Sky Betting & Gaming;
CrownBet,
PokerStars.
Sean Ryan — Director Nominee Mr. Ryan is a digital media and technology operator with extensive global experience in online payments, e-commerce, marketplaces, mobile ad networks, digital games, enterprise collaboration platforms, blockchain, real money gaming and online music. VP of Business Platform Partnerships at
Facebook, Inc. **Yeah, that Facebook!
Tom Roche — Director Nominee Mr. Roche has more than 40 years of experience in the gaming industry as a regulator, advisor and independent auditor. Mr. Roche joined
Ernst & Young as a partner in 2003 and opened its Las Vegas office. Mr. Roche has been integral to numerous transactions that have shaped the current gaming landscape, including
Wynn Resorts initial public offering. Mr. Roche headed the regulatory advisory services on the buyout of
Harrah’s Entertainment;
Dubai World/MGM Resorts. Mr. Roche headed the regulatory and due diligence advisory services to Dubai World in its approximately $5.1 billion investment in MGM.
submitted by jorlev to SPACs [link] [comments]
These are the statistical top 500 movies of all time, according to 23 different websites
Hey everyone, great to be back again. Some of you might remember a similar title from a post I made back in April, where I made a
list of the top 250 movies with 13 sources, or a
preview of this list I made last month.
I want to emphasize that this is
NOT an official ranking nor my personal ranking; it is just a statistical and, personally, interesting look at 500 amazing movies. These rankings reflect the opinions of thousands of critics and millions of people around the world. And I am glad that this list is able to cover a wide range of genres, decades, and countries. So before I get bombarded with "Why isn't X on here?" or "How is X above Y?" comments, I wanted to clear that up.
I sourced my data from Sight & Sound (both critic and director lists), TSPDT, iCheckMovies,
11 domestic websites (Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, IMDb, Letterboxd, TMDb, Trakt, Blu-Ray, MovieLens, RateYourMusic, Criticker, and Critics Choice), and
9 international audience sites (FilmAffinity, Douban, Naver, MUBI, Filmweb, Kinopoisk, CSFD, Moviemeter, and Senscritique). This balance of domestic/international ratings made the list more well-rounded and internationally representative (sites from Spain, China, Korea, Poland, Russia, Czech Republic, Netherlands, and France).
As for my algorithm, I weighted websites according to both their Alexa ranking and their number of votes compared to other sites. For example, since
The Godfather has hundreds of thousands of votes on Letterboxd but only a couple thousand on Metacritic, Letterboxd would be weighted more heavily. After obtaining the weighted averages, I then added the movie's iCheckMovies' favs/checks ratio and TSPDT ranking, if applicable. Regarding TSPDT, I included the top 2000 movies; as an example of my calculations,
Rear Window's ranking of #41 would add (2000-41)/2000=0.9795 points to its weighted average. I removed movies that had <7-8K votes on IMDb, as these mostly had low ratings and numbers of votes across different sites as well. For both Sight & Sound lists, I added between 0.5 and 1 point to a movie's score based on its ranking, which I thought was an adequate reflection of how difficult it is to be included on these lists. As examples, a #21 movie would have 0.9 points added while a #63 would have 0.69 points.
So without further ado, the statistical top 500 movies ever made. I separated the scores into overall, critics, domestic, and international columns to make comparisons easier. This list on
Letterboxd.
Ranking | Title | Overall Score | Critics | Domestic | International | Year | Director |
1 | The Godfather | 93.89 | 97.73 | 90.50 | 89.36 | 1972 | Francis Ford Coppola |
2 | The Godfather: Part II | 91.93 | 93.30 | 89.04 | 88.06 | 1974 | Francis Ford Coppola |
3 | Seven Samurai | 91.05 | 97.38 | 87.63 | 85.90 | 1954 | Akira Kurosawa |
4 | 12 Angry Men | 90.45 | 95.45 | 88.74 | 88.62 | 1957 | Sidney Lumet |
5 | City Lights | 89.94 | 96.75 | 85.67 | 85.93 | 1931 | Charlie Chaplin |
6 | The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | 89.45 | 91.20 | 87.81 | 86.59 | 1966 | Sergio Leone |
7 | The Shawshank Redemption | 89.41 | 82.95 | 89.49 | 89.18 | 1994 | Frank Darabont |
8 | Psycho | 89.29 | 95.23 | 85.70 | 85.01 | 1960 | Alfred Hitchcock |
9 | Modern Times | 89.28 | 95.55 | 85.21 | 85.37 | 1936 | Charlie Chaplin |
10 | Schindler's List | 89.08 | 93.80 | 87.22 | 87.29 | 1993 | Steven Spielberg |
11 | Pulp Fiction | 88.85 | 92.60 | 87.69 | 86.42 | 1994 | Quentin Tarantino |
12 | Rear Window | 88.63 | 97.65 | 85.40 | 83.33 | 1954 | Alfred Hitchcock |
13 | One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest | 88.55 | 87.38 | 86.28 | 86.97 | 1975 | Miloš Forman |
14 | Apocalypse Now | 88.54 | 93.85 | 85.24 | 83.48 | 1979 | Francis Ford Coppola |
15 | Tokyo Story | 88.49 | 98.30 | 85.16 | 83.76 | 1953 | Yasujirō Ozu |
16 | Spirited Away | 88.34 | 93.78 | 86.80 | 85.91 | 2001 | Hayao Miyazaki |
17 | GoodFellas | 88.03 | 91.48 | 87.00 | 84.03 | 1990 | Martin Scorsese |
18 | Vertigo | 88.02 | 95.60 | 84.05 | 82.76 | 1958 | Alfred Hitchcock |
19 | Singin' in the Rain | 88.01 | 97.65 | 83.95 | 83.13 | 1952 | Gene Kelly, Stanley Donen |
20 | Sunset Boulevard | 88.00 | 95.45 | 85.44 | 84.22 | 1950 | Billy Wilder |
21 | Citizen Kane | 87.83 | 99.03 | 83.06 | 82.22 | 1941 | Orson Welles |
22 | Harakiri | 87.79 | 85.83 | 88.00 | 86.29 | 1962 | Masaki Kobayashi |
23 | Rashomon | 87.74 | 96.55 | 83.52 | 82.73 | 1950 | Akira Kurosawa |
24 | Once Upon a Time in the West | 87.71 | 86.65 | 85.48 | 84.62 | 1968 | Sergio Leone |
25 | Fanny and Alexander | 87.54 | 97.30 | 83.15 | 83.00 | 1982 | Ingmar Bergman |
26 | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King | 87.40 | 92.59 | 86.06 | 85.38 | 2003 | Peter Jackson |
27 | Andrei Rublev | 87.39 | 91.90 | 83.80 | 83.94 | 1966 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
28 | The Passion of Joan of Arc | 87.39 | 94.65 | 83.88 | 83.57 | 1928 | Carl Theodor Dreyer |
29 | Sherlock Jr. | 87.36 | 96.45 | 83.64 | 85.60 | 1924 | Buster Keaton |
30 | Bicycle Thieves | 87.35 | 94.70 | 83.91 | 83.46 | 1948 | Vittorio De Sica |
31 | Casablanca | 87.35 | 98.00 | 85.25 | 82.62 | 1942 | Michael Curtiz |
32 | Some Like It Hot | 87.28 | 95.30 | 82.11 | 83.73 | 1959 | Billy Wilder |
33 | Persona | 87.22 | 88.20 | 84.28 | 83.07 | 1966 | Ingmar Bergman |
34 | Children of Paradise | 87.21 | 95.33 | 84.81 | 83.27 | 1945 | Marcel Carné |
35 | Taxi Driver | 87.14 | 93.88 | 83.60 | 82.06 | 1976 | Martin Scorsese |
36 | The Dark Knight | 87.08 | 88.81 | 86.96 | 84.80 | 2008 | Christopher Nolan |
37 | Metropolis | 87.03 | 96.00 | 82.92 | 84.01 | 1927 | Fritz Lang |
38 | Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans | 87.02 | 93.95 | 82.23 | 84.02 | 1927 | F. W. Murnau |
39 | Stalker | 87.02 | 92.30 | 83.86 | 83.29 | 1979 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
40 | Pather Panchali | 86.96 | 94.35 | 84.40 | 82.80 | 1955 | Satyajit Ray |
41 | Lawrence of Arabia | 86.95 | 97.65 | 83.76 | 81.49 | 1962 | David Lean |
42 | M | 86.91 | 96.20 | 84.34 | 82.92 | 1931 | Fritz Lang |
43 | Ordet | 86.82 | 98.10 | 83.08 | 82.55 | 1955 | Carl Theodor Dreyer |
44 | It's a Wonderful Life | 86.77 | 90.45 | 85.17 | 84.90 | 1946 | Frank Capra |
45 | Satantango | 86.76 | 90.45 | 84.58 | 84.21 | 1994 | Béla Tarr |
46 | Parasite | 86.72 | 96.34 | 86.55 | 83.15 | 2019 | Bong Joon-ho |
47 | The 400 Blows | 86.70 | 96.70 | 83.14 | 82.60 | 1959 | François Truffaut |
48 | Ikiru | 86.56 | 93.80 | 85.48 | 84.29 | 1952 | Akira Kurosawa |
49 | Mirror | 86.50 | 95.60 | 82.75 | 82.34 | 1975 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
50 | Come and See | 86.50 | 90.50 | 85.22 | 83.13 | 1985 | Elem Klimov |
51 | The Apartment | 86.48 | 92.00 | 84.09 | 82.99 | 1960 | Billy Wilder |
52 | The General | 86.45 | 91.45 | 82.59 | 83.87 | 1926 | Buster Keaton, Clyde Bruckman |
53 | Grave of the Fireflies | 86.43 | 95.13 | 85.85 | 82.97 | 1988 | Isao Takahata |
54 | Le Trou | 86.41 | 89.95 | 85.46 | 85.14 | 1960 | Jacques Becker |
55 | The Battle of Algiers | 86.37 | 95.40 | 82.64 | 81.24 | 1966 | Gillo Pontecorvo |
56 | A Man Escaped | 86.34 | 96.50 | 83.67 | 82.03 | 1956 | Robert Bresson |
57 | Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb | 86.34 | 95.85 | 84.37 | 83.03 | 1964 | Stanley Kubrick |
58 | Paths of Glory | 86.25 | 92.30 | 84.97 | 84.48 | 1957 | Stanley Kubrick |
59 | The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring | 86.24 | 88.75 | 85.61 | 84.31 | 2001 | Peter Jackson |
60 | All About Eve | 86.23 | 96.95 | 83.69 | 83.20 | 1950 | Joseph L. Mankiewicz |
61 | Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back | 86.21 | 86.93 | 87.05 | 83.29 | 1980 | Irvin Kershner |
62 | High and Low | 86.16 | 86.55 | 86.08 | 84.26 | 1963 | Akira Kurosawa |
63 | The Great Dictator | 86.15 | 91.10 | 84.25 | 85.03 | 1940 | Charlie Chaplin |
64 | The Silence of the Lambs | 86.12 | 88.68 | 85.29 | 84.17 | 1991 | Jonathan Demme |
65 | 2001: A Space Odyssey | 86.06 | 88.35 | 82.93 | 81.54 | 1968 | Stanley Kubrick |
66 | North by Northwest | 86.03 | 96.38 | 83.17 | 81.74 | 1959 | Alfred Hitchcock |
67 | Double Indemnity | 85.91 | 94.38 | 83.84 | 83.12 | 1944 | Billy Wilder |
68 | Ugetsu | 85.91 | 97.25 | 82.69 | 81.91 | 1953 | Kenji Mizoguchi |
69 | Woman in the Dunes | 85.91 | 93.95 | 84.71 | 83.77 | 1964 | Hiroshi Teshigahara |
70 | Sansho the Bailiff | 85.88 | 95.50 | 84.24 | 82.21 | 1954 | Kenji Mizoguchi |
71 | Once Upon a Time in America | 85.87 | 86.10 | 83.84 | 85.53 | 1984 | Sergio Leone |
72 | City of God | 85.86 | 84.08 | 86.39 | 84.00 | 2002 | Fernando Meirelles, Kátia Lund |
73 | Late Spring | 85.81 | 94.75 | 83.74 | 82.27 | 1949 | Yasujirō Ozu |
74 | Barry Lyndon | 85.80 | 87.95 | 82.44 | 82.30 | 1975 | Stanley Kubrick |
75 | The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers | 85.78 | 88.78 | 85.00 | 84.29 | 2002 | Peter Jackson |
76 | Raging Bull | 85.77 | 90.48 | 82.01 | 81.80 | 1980 | Martin Scorsese |
77 | Chinatown | 85.72 | 94.08 | 83.32 | 80.69 | 1974 | Roman Polanski |
78 | Alien | 85.69 | 91.73 | 84.76 | 82.62 | 1979 | Ridley Scott |
79 | Ran | 85.68 | 94.70 | 83.93 | 82.52 | 1985 | Akira Kurosawa |
80 | The Seventh Seal | 85.67 | 92.10 | 83.52 | 82.13 | 1957 | Ingmar Bergman |
81 | The Kid | 85.61 | 92.85 | 82.91 | 84.94 | 1921 | Charlie Chaplin |
82 | Wild Strawberries | 85.51 | 90.05 | 83.38 | 82.24 | 1957 | Ingmar Bergman |
83 | A Brighter Summer Day | 85.50 | 93.38 | 84.07 | 81.01 | 1991 | Edward Yang |
84 | 8½ | 85.48 | 91.20 | 82.59 | 81.09 | 1963 | Federico Fellini |
85 | The Pianist | 85.38 | 88.69 | 83.31 | 84.80 | 2002 | Roman Polanski |
86 | The World of Apu | 85.38 | 93.20 | 84.38 | 83.09 | 1959 | Satyajit Ray |
87 | La Dolce Vita | 85.37 | 94.38 | 81.40 | 80.48 | 1960 | Federico Fellini |
88 | Star Wars | 85.33 | 90.03 | 85.22 | 81.92 | 1977 | George Lucas |
89 | The Best of Youth | 85.31 | 88.78 | 85.31 | 83.64 | 2003 | Marco Tullio Giordana |
90 | The Gold Rush | 85.29 | 94.55 | 81.93 | 83.59 | 1925 | Charlie Chaplin |
91 | The Third Man | 85.26 | 96.50 | 82.91 | 80.21 | 1949 | Carol Reed |
92 | The Treasure of the Sierra Madre | 85.20 | 96.68 | 82.77 | 81.81 | 1948 | John Huston |
93 | I Am Cuba | 85.18 | 93.60 | 82.00 | 83.44 | 1964 | Mikhail Kalatozov |
94 | The Lives of Others | 85.14 | 89.03 | 84.12 | 82.73 | 2006 | Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck |
95 | Witness for the Prosecution | 85.13 | 92.65 | 83.67 | 84.99 | 1957 | Billy Wilder |
96 | Touch of Evil | 85.11 | 95.70 | 81.36 | 79.65 | 1958 | Orson Welles |
97 | WALL-E | 85.10 | 92.09 | 82.82 | 82.64 | 2008 | Andrew Stanton |
98 | Scenes from a Marriage | 85.02 | 86.85 | 84.80 | 83.06 | 1974 | Ingmar Bergman |
99 | To Be or Not to Be | 84.99 | 89.58 | 82.52 | 83.39 | 1942 | Ernst Lubitsch |
100 | A Separation | 84.92 | 94.24 | 83.34 | 80.90 | 2011 | Asghar Farhadi |
101 | The Night of the Hunter | 84.91 | 96.93 | 81.17 | 79.06 | 1955 | Charles Laughton |
102 | Three Colors: Red | 84.87 | 96.78 | 83.32 | 80.78 | 1994 | Krzysztof Kieślowski |
103 | Yojimbo | 84.87 | 91.55 | 83.85 | 82.99 | 1961 | Akira Kurosawa |
104 | Back to the Future | 84.85 | 89.38 | 84.47 | 81.94 | 1985 | Robert Zemeckis |
105 | My Neighbor Totoro | 84.84 | 87.53 | 83.44 | 83.17 | 1988 | Hayao Miyazaki |
106 | In the Mood for Love | 84.84 | 83.87 | 82.55 | 81.20 | 2000 | Wong Kar-wai |
107 | Princess Mononoke | 84.83 | 81.18 | 85.02 | 84.24 | 1999 | Hayao Miyazaki |
108 | Saving Private Ryan | 84.82 | 90.35 | 83.94 | 82.50 | 1998 | Steven Spielberg |
109 | Cinema Paradiso | 84.78 | 82.30 | 84.73 | 83.43 | 1988 | Giuseppe Tornatore |
110 | La Jetée | 84.75 | 89.25 | 83.27 | 81.80 | 1962 | Chris Marker |
111 | The Wages of Fear | 84.71 | 94.60 | 82.99 | 82.80 | 1953 | Henri-Georges Clouzot |
112 | Das Boot | 84.68 | 90.13 | 83.62 | 82.71 | 1981 | Wolfgang Petersen |
113 | Fight Club | 84.65 | 71.18 | 86.39 | 84.95 | 1999 | David Fincher |
114 | Nights of Cabiria | 84.64 | 92.25 | 82.72 | 83.13 | 1957 | Federico Fellini |
115 | La Strada | 84.61 | 92.60 | 80.79 | 82.78 | 1954 | Federico Fellini |
116 | Amadeus | 84.53 | 89.55 | 82.88 | 82.59 | 1984 | Miloš Forman |
117 | Forrest Gump | 84.50 | 76.90 | 83.06 | 86.12 | 1994 | Robert Zemeckis |
118 | Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse | 84.49 | 90.41 | 85.03 | 81.69 | 2018 | Peter Ramsey, Rodney Rothman, Bob Persichetti |
119 | The Lion King | 84.45 | 88.28 | 77.22 | 84.09 | 1994 | Rob Minkoff, Roger Allers |
120 | Inception | 84.43 | 82.07 | 84.18 | 84.17 | 2010 | Christopher Nolan |
121 | Whiplash | 84.42 | 89.53 | 84.87 | 81.96 | 2014 | Damien Chazelle |
122 | The Shop Around the Corner | 84.40 | 94.43 | 80.85 | 82.37 | 1940 | Ernst Lubitsch |
123 | Rififi | 84.38 | 92.00 | 83.03 | 81.58 | 1955 | Jules Dassin |
124 | Umberto D. | 84.38 | 92.63 | 82.20 | 81.75 | 1952 | Vittorio De Sica |
125 | Army of Shadows | 84.37 | 95.30 | 82.98 | 80.50 | 1969 | Jean-Pierre Melville |
126 | Blade Runner | 84.34 | 85.85 | 82.57 | 80.29 | 1982 | Ridley Scott |
127 | Samurai Rebellion | 84.33 | 89.05 | 82.85 | 83.84 | 1967 | Masaki Kobayashi |
128 | Close-Up | 84.31 | 85.70 | 81.99 | 80.69 | 1990 | Abbas Kiarostami |
129 | The Circus | 84.29 | 90.35 | 81.69 | 83.14 | 1928 | Charlie Chaplin |
130 | Raiders of the Lost Ark | 84.19 | 89.33 | 84.31 | 80.57 | 1981 | Steven Spielberg |
131 | Grand Illusion | 84.18 | 95.35 | 81.85 | 79.78 | 1937 | Jean Renoir |
132 | A Clockwork Orange | 84.18 | 82.78 | 82.37 | 82.51 | 1971 | Stanley Kubrick |
133 | Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind | 84.07 | 89.37 | 83.36 | 80.57 | 2004 | Michel Gondry |
134 | A Woman Under the Influence | 84.01 | 87.40 | 82.51 | 80.40 | 1974 | John Cassavetes |
135 | The Cranes Are Flying | 84.00 | 89.30 | 82.76 | 82.40 | 1957 | Mikhail Kalatozov |
136 | Yi Yi | 83.91 | 91.25 | 82.48 | 79.64 | 2000 | Edward Yang |
137 | To Kill a Mockingbird | 83.91 | 89.13 | 81.98 | 82.20 | 1962 | Robert Mulligan |
138 | The Matrix | 83.90 | 77.78 | 84.54 | 83.06 | 1999 | Wachowski Sisters |
139 | The Sting | 83.90 | 85.73 | 82.71 | 83.36 | 1973 | George Roy Hill |
140 | The Mother and the Whore | 83.87 | 94.55 | 81.24 | 79.82 | 1973 | Jean Eustache |
141 | Se7en | 83.86 | 72.15 | 84.91 | 84.48 | 1995 | David Fincher |
142 | Early Summer | 83.85 | 94.45 | 82.19 | 82.01 | 1951 | Yasujirō Ozu |
143 | Werckmeister Harmonies | 83.80 | 91.73 | 80.89 | 81.93 | 2000 | Béla Tarr, Ágnes Hranitzky |
144 | Coco | 83.80 | 86.21 | 82.73 | 83.66 | 2017 | Adrian Molina, Lee Unkrich |
145 | Toy Story | 83.76 | 95.03 | 82.30 | 80.15 | 1995 | John Lasseter |
146 | It Happened One Night | 83.76 | 90.83 | 81.46 | 81.76 | 1934 | Frank Capra |
147 | Reservoir Dogs | 83.74 | 84.68 | 83.12 | 81.99 | 1992 | Quentin Tarantino |
148 | Unforgiven | 83.73 | 88.55 | 82.24 | 81.59 | 1992 | Clint Eastwood |
149 | The Deer Hunter | 83.73 | 87.68 | 80.57 | 82.06 | 1978 | Michael Cimino |
150 | The Young and the Damned | 83.72 | 87.10 | 82.58 | 80.82 | 1950 | Luis Buñuel |
151 | The Best Years of Our Lives | 83.68 | 92.63 | 81.19 | 81.20 | 1946 | William Wyler |
152 | The Leopard | 83.66 | 97.30 | 79.56 | 79.57 | 1963 | Luchino Visconti |
153 | Time of the Gypsies | 83.65 | 86.05 | 83.31 | 82.29 | 1988 | Emir Kusturica |
154 | Ali: Fear Eats the Soul | 83.61 | 96.70 | 80.51 | 79.97 | 1974 | Rainer Werner Fassbinder |
155 | Raise the Red Lantern | 83.57 | 90.25 | 82.37 | 81.81 | 1991 | Zhang Yimou |
156 | Terminator 2: Judgment Day | 83.57 | 82.00 | 84.11 | 81.83 | 1991 | James Cameron |
157 | The Shining | 83.55 | 75.35 | 84.08 | 81.80 | 1980 | Stanley Kubrick |
158 | Viridiana | 83.54 | 92.95 | 80.68 | 80.81 | 1961 | Luis Buñuel |
159 | Portrait of a Lady on Fire | 83.52 | 93.59 | 83.08 | 80.02 | 2019 | Céline Sciamma |
160 | Greed | 83.51 | 97.05 | 80.65 | 80.64 | 1924 | Erich von Stroheim |
161 | Gone with the Wind | 83.48 | 92.90 | 80.01 | 81.68 | 1939 | Victor Fleming |
162 | There Will Be Blood | 83.48 | 89.65 | 81.91 | 79.02 | 2007 | Paul Thomas Anderson |
163 | L.A. Confidential | 83.46 | 91.63 | 82.08 | 80.81 | 1997 | Curtis Hanson |
164 | Paris, Texas | 83.46 | 83.95 | 82.89 | 81.66 | 1984 | Wim Wenders |
165 | Throne of Blood | 83.45 | 91.30 | 82.18 | 81.49 | 1957 | Akira Kurosawa |
166 | Toy Story 3 | 83.43 | 93.55 | 81.61 | 80.32 | 2010 | Lee Unkrich |
167 | Memento | 83.43 | 85.20 | 83.78 | 80.76 | 2000 | Christopher Nolan |
168 | On the Waterfront | 83.37 | 93.00 | 82.23 | 79.52 | 1954 | Elia Kazan |
169 | Trip to the Moon | 83.37 | 94.70 | 79.96 | 82.83 | 1902 | Georges Méliès |
170 | The Rules of the Game | 83.33 | 96.55 | 80.45 | 78.02 | 1939 | Jean Renoir |
171 | Red Beard | 83.32 | 74.15 | 83.41 | 83.27 | 1965 | Akira Kurosawa |
172 | The Grapes of Wrath | 83.32 | 95.45 | 80.42 | 80.34 | 1940 | John Ford |
173 | Au Hasard Balthazar | 83.29 | 98.08 | 77.93 | 77.54 | 1966 | Robert Bresson |
174 | Autumn Sonata | 83.29 | 84.85 | 83.09 | 82.66 | 1978 | Ingmar Bergman |
175 | Annie Hall | 83.28 | 93.18 | 80.58 | 80.58 | 1977 | Woody Allen |
176 | The Conformist | 83.27 | 96.68 | 79.92 | 78.58 | 1970 | Bernardo Bertolucci |
177 | Rocco and His Brothers | 83.24 | 84.73 | 81.95 | 81.68 | 1960 | Luchino Visconti |
178 | Dersu Uzala | 83.23 | 74.75 | 82.35 | 83.37 | 1975 | Akira Kurosawa |
179 | Cool Hand Luke | 83.21 | 93.05 | 82.22 | 79.83 | 1967 | Stuart Rosenberg |
180 | Monty Python and the Holy Grail | 83.18 | 91.98 | 82.96 | 79.30 | 1975 | Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones |
181 | Le Samouraï | 83.18 | 92.35 | 82.45 | 79.40 | 1967 | Jean-Pierre Melville |
182 | Aliens | 83.18 | 88.73 | 83.29 | 79.61 | 1986 | James Cameron |
183 | PlayTime | 83.16 | 93.50 | 80.22 | 78.80 | 1967 | Jacques Tati |
184 | The Bridge on the River Kwai | 83.14 | 90.58 | 81.93 | 80.24 | 1957 | David Lean |
185 | The Red Shoes | 83.13 | 93.15 | 82.82 | 79.96 | 1948 | Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger |
186 | American Beauty | 83.10 | 87.15 | 81.93 | 81.13 | 1999 | Sam Mendes |
187 | To Live | 83.10 | 84.00 | 82.16 | 82.46 | 1994 | Zhang Yimou |
188 | Battleship Potemkin | 83.10 | 95.85 | 77.81 | 80.41 | 1925 | Sergei Eisenstein |
189 | Day of Wrath | 83.09 | 93.40 | 81.07 | 81.29 | 1943 | Carl Theodor Dreyer |
190 | All Quiet on the Western Front | 83.07 | 92.85 | 80.05 | 81.48 | 1930 | Lewis Milestone |
191 | It's Such a Beautiful Day | 83.07 | 91.25 | 83.62 | 79.77 | 2012 | Don Hertzfeldt |
192 | Full Metal Jacket | 83.06 | 81.53 | 82.21 | 82.54 | 1987 | Stanley Kubrick |
193 | The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari | 83.05 | 96.40 | 79.84 | 81.83 | 1920 | Robert Wiene |
194 | Kes | 83.03 | 97.80 | 79.59 | 80.55 | 1969 | Ken Loach |
195 | The Usual Suspects | 83.02 | 80.23 | 84.08 | 81.48 | 1995 | Bryan Singer |
196 | The Cameraman | 83.00 | 93.90 | 80.77 | 81.57 | 1928 | Edward Segdwick, Buster Keaton |
197 | Aparajito | 83.00 | 90.90 | 81.81 | 81.20 | 1956 | Satyajit Ray |
198 | The Elephant Man | 83.00 | 83.00 | 82.10 | 81.87 | 1980 | David Lynch |
199 | Rebecca | 82.98 | 90.08 | 81.08 | 80.93 | 1940 | Alfred Hitchcock |
200 | Make Way for Tomorrow | 82.97 | 95.80 | 81.72 | 80.14 | 1937 | Leo McCarey |
201 | The Great Escape | 82.97 | 87.68 | 82.29 | 80.66 | 1963 | John Sturges |
202 | Your Name | 82.97 | 84.55 | 84.07 | 81.29 | 2016 | Makoto Shinkai |
203 | Limelight | 82.92 | 88.00 | 79.85 | 83.02 | 1952 | Charlie Chaplin |
204 | Breathless | 82.92 | 91.95 | 78.88 | 79.10 | 1960 | Jean-Luc Godard |
205 | Underground | 82.91 | 80.75 | 81.26 | 82.64 | 1995 | Emir Kusturica |
206 | The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance | 82.88 | 91.90 | 81.08 | 79.53 | 1962 | John Ford |
207 | Aguirre: The Wrath of God | 82.87 | 94.55 | 80.46 | 78.62 | 1972 | Werner Herzog |
208 | Oldboy | 82.86 | 78.98 | 84.00 | 81.27 | 2003 | Park Chan-wook |
209 | Up | 82.84 | 90.28 | 81.32 | 80.86 | 2009 | Pete Docter |
210 | Anatomy of a Murder | 82.84 | 94.00 | 80.57 | 80.02 | 1959 | Otto Preminger |
211 | The Wild Bunch | 82.84 | 90.35 | 79.45 | 80.12 | 1969 | Sam Peckinpah |
212 | The Hunt | 82.75 | 82.08 | 82.79 | 82.62 | 2012 | Thomas Vinterberg |
213 | Il Sorpasso | 82.74 | 95.75 | 82.84 | 79.57 | 1962 | Dino Risi |
214 | The Last Laugh | 82.74 | 95.25 | 79.47 | 81.61 | 1924 | F. W. Murnau |
215 | A Streetcar Named Desire | 82.73 | 94.60 | 79.89 | 80.26 | 1951 | Elia Kazan |
216 | Life Is Beautiful | 82.73 | 68.45 | 83.60 | 85.57 | 1997 | Roberto Benigni |
217 | A Short Film About Love | 82.71 | 87.10 | 81.90 | 81.89 | 1988 | Krzysztof Kieślowski |
218 | The Shop on Main Street | 82.71 | 94.45 | 82.15 | 80.43 | 1965 | Ján Kadár, Elmar Klos |
219 | Rio Bravo | 82.71 | 92.10 | 80.46 | 79.80 | 1959 | Howard Hawks |
220 | Roman Holiday | 82.70 | 84.55 | 80.74 | 82.42 | 1953 | William Wyler |
221 | Ivan's Childhood | 82.69 | 94.80 | 81.25 | 80.37 | 1962 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
222 | The Exterminating Angel | 82.68 | 91.10 | 81.66 | 80.17 | 1962 | Luis Buñuel |
223 | Trainspotting | 82.68 | 85.20 | 81.57 | 81.21 | 1996 | Danny Boyle |
224 | The Last Picture Show | 82.67 | 94.15 | 79.90 | 79.56 | 1971 | Peter Bogdanovich |
225 | The Truman Show | 82.64 | 89.63 | 79.70 | 82.15 | 1998 | Peter Weir |
226 | Memories of Murder | 82.64 | 82.88 | 82.68 | 80.94 | 2003 | Bong Joon-ho |
227 | Faust | 82.62 | 89.70 | 80.23 | 81.94 | 1926 | F. W. Murnau |
228 | Sans Soleil | 82.62 | 83.90 | 79.45 | 80.51 | 1983 | Chris Marker |
229 | Song of the Sea | 82.57 | 87.63 | 80.59 | 82.23 | 2014 | Tomm Moore |
230 | Léon: The Professional | 82.55 | 67.38 | 84.05 | 84.07 | 1994 | Luc Besson |
231 | Fargo | 82.54 | 87.45 | 82.36 | 79.19 | 1996 | Coen Brothers |
232 | Solaris | 82.54 | 89.95 | 80.91 | 79.69 | 1972 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
233 | Sweet Smell of Success | 82.52 | 96.53 | 80.81 | 77.62 | 1957 | Alexander Mackendrick |
234 | For a Few Dollars More | 82.52 | 79.28 | 82.38 | 83.15 | 1965 | Sergio Leone |
235 | White Heat | 82.51 | 90.65 | 80.77 | 81.24 | 1949 | Raoul Walsh |
236 | Brief Encounter | 82.50 | 88.35 | 80.81 | 81.03 | 1945 | David Lean |
237 | Wings of Desire | 82.49 | 85.70 | 81.30 | 80.42 | 1987 | Wim Wenders |
238 | Diabolique | 82.47 | 90.70 | 81.27 | 80.73 | 1955 | Henri-Georges Clouzot |
239 | An Autumn Afternoon | 82.45 | 91.95 | 81.68 | 79.85 | 1962 | Yasujirō Ozu |
240 | The Tale of the Princess Kaguya | 82.44 | 90.63 | 81.16 | 80.43 | 2013 | Isao Takahata |
241 | Amarcord | 82.41 | 85.95 | 79.26 | 80.73 | 1973 | Federico Fellini |
242 | Heat | 82.40 | 79.08 | 82.03 | 81.73 | 1995 | Michael Mann |
243 | L'Atalante | 82.40 | 95.60 | 78.32 | 78.10 | 1934 | Jean Vigo |
244 | Django Unchained | 82.39 | 83.44 | 82.23 | 81.94 | 2012 | Quentin Tarantino |
245 | Jeanne Dielman, 23 Commerce Quay, 1080 Brussels | 82.38 | 95.50 | 78.73 | 79.69 | 1975 | Chantal Akerman |
246 | Kind Hearts and Coronets | 82.38 | 95.60 | 80.80 | 79.72 | 1949 | Robert Hamer |
247 | Dog Day Afternoon | 82.37 | 88.40 | 81.11 | 79.80 | 1975 | Sidney Lumet |
248 | Forbidden Games | 82.37 | 93.75 | 80.36 | 80.99 | 1952 | René Clément |
249 | The Crowd | 82.35 | 93.35 | 79.21 | 81.23 | 1928 | King Vidor |
250 | Notorious | 82.35 | 96.78 | 79.96 | 78.21 | 1946 | Alfred Hitchcock |
251 | Mary and Max | 82.35 | 88.05 | 80.95 | 82.42 | 2009 | Adam Elliot |
252 | Persepolis | 82.34 | 88.95 | 80.09 | 80.77 | 2007 | Marjane Satrapi, Vincent Paronnaud |
253 | Howl's Moving Castle | 82.33 | 78.71 | 82.63 | 83.10 | 2004 | Hayao Miyazaki |
254 | Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind | 82.33 | 85.10 | 81.54 | 82.03 | 1984 | Hayao Miyazaki |
255 | Safety Last! | 82.33 | 92.25 | 80.95 | 81.10 | 1923 | Fred C. Newmeyer, Sam Taylor |
256 | Rosemary's Baby | 82.32 | 94.78 | 79.99 | 78.69 | 1968 | Roman Polanski |
257 | L'Avventura | 82.32 | 92.10 | 79.08 | 78.03 | 1960 | Michelangelo Antonioni |
258 | The Searchers | 82.32 | 93.90 | 78.16 | 76.66 | 1956 | John Ford |
259 | La Haine | 82.30 | 90.60 | 82.38 | 79.56 | 1995 | Mathieu Kassovitz |
260 | Three Colors: Blue | 82.30 | 88.28 | 81.55 | 79.23 | 1993 | Krzysztof Kieślowski |
261 | Chungking Express | 82.30 | 79.95 | 82.29 | 80.73 | 1994 | Wong Kar-wai |
262 | Inside Out | 82.29 | 93.66 | 80.27 | 79.85 | 2015 | Pete Docter |
263 | Where is the Friend's Home? | 82.28 | 89.25 | 81.22 | 80.21 | 1987 | Abbas Kiarostami |
264 | Cries and Whispers | 82.27 | 85.45 | 81.02 | 80.80 | 1972 | Ingmar Bergman |
265 | Napoleon | 82.22 | 93.25 | 81.89 | 78.99 | 1927 | Abel Gance |
266 | Paper Moon | 82.19 | 83.08 | 81.37 | 81.29 | 1973 | Peter Bogdanovich |
267 | The Spirit of the Beehive | 82.17 | 89.83 | 79.31 | 78.91 | 1973 | Víctor Erice |
268 | A Special Day | 82.16 | 90.20 | 81.11 | 81.25 | 1977 | Ettore Scola |
269 | Nostalghia | 82.15 | 83.00 | 80.91 | 81.23 | 1983 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
270 | Network | 82.13 | 85.45 | 82.36 | 79.08 | 1976 | Sidney Lumet |
271 | L'Eclisse | 82.11 | 84.70 | 79.78 | 78.81 | 1962 | Michelangelo Antonioni |
272 | Mr. Smith Goes to Washington | 82.09 | 80.83 | 81.78 | 81.15 | 1939 | Frank Capra |
273 | Sanjuro | 82.09 | 91.90 | 81.67 | 80.85 | 1962 | Akira Kurosawa |
274 | Badlands | 82.06 | 93.38 | 79.77 | 77.21 | 1973 | Terrence Malick |
275 | Vivre Sa Vie | 82.06 | 85.20 | 80.12 | 79.83 | 1962 | Jean-Luc Godard |
276 | Nobody Knows | 82.06 | 87.18 | 81.12 | 81.15 | 2004 | Hirokazu Koreeda |
277 | No Country for Old Men | 82.05 | 90.68 | 80.56 | 78.47 | 2007 | Coen Brothers |
278 | Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring | 82.05 | 86.05 | 80.76 | 80.62 | 2003 | Kim Ki-duk |
279 | La Notte | 82.04 | 78.35 | 81.45 | 81.11 | 1961 | Michelangelo Antonioni |
280 | The Celebration | 82.04 | 84.23 | 81.34 | 80.08 | 1998 | Thomas Vinterberg |
281 | In the Name of the Father | 82.04 | 84.90 | 81.14 | 81.85 | 1993 | Jim Sheridan |
282 | I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang | 82.02 | 89.55 | 80.18 | 81.56 | 1932 | Mervyn LeRoy |
283 | Shoplifters | 82.01 | 92.39 | 80.60 | 79.31 | 2018 | Hirokazu Koreeda |
284 | Finding Nemo | 82.01 | 92.60 | 80.13 | 78.76 | 2003 | Andrew Stanton, Lee Unkrich |
285 | Z | 81.98 | 87.55 | 82.21 | 79.59 | 1969 | Costa-Gavras |
286 | The Phantom Carriage | 81.96 | 95.00 | 80.01 | 80.32 | 1921 | Victor Sjöström |
287 | Manhattan | 81.95 | 86.23 | 80.50 | 79.81 | 1979 | Woody Allen |
288 | Rome, Open City | 81.94 | 95.40 | 80.45 | 79.27 | 1945 | Robert Rossellini |
289 | Children of Heaven | 81.93 | 80.15 | 81.24 | 82.01 | 1997 | Majid Majidi |
290 | The Green Mile | 81.92 | 71.93 | 82.95 | 84.38 | 1999 | Frank Darabont |
291 | The Iron Giant | 81.91 | 86.61 | 80.88 | 79.95 | 1999 | Brad Bird |
292 | The Sacrifice | 81.90 | 80.30 | 80.47 | 81.37 | 1986 | Andrei Tarkovsky |
293 | The Philadelphia Story | 81.90 | 94.95 | 79.79 | 77.86 | 1940 | George Cukor |
294 | The Twilight Samurai | 81.90 | 86.10 | 81.07 | 81.13 | 2002 | Yôji Yamada |
295 | Before Sunset | 81.88 | 87.79 | 81.42 | 78.41 | 2004 | Richard Linklater |
296 | Before Sunrise | 81.86 | 84.40 | 82.24 | 79.44 | 1995 | Richard Linklater |
297 | Castle in the Sky | 81.85 | 81.63 | 81.49 | 82.06 | 1986 | Hayao Miyazaki |
298 | The Departed | 81.84 | 86.92 | 82.82 | 79.04 | 2006 | Martin Scorsese |
299 | Brazil | 81.83 | 90.23 | 80.61 | 78.37 | 1985 | Terry Gilliam |
300 | Incendies | 81.81 | 83.85 | 81.88 | 80.74 | 2011 | Denis Villenueve |
301 | The Maltese Falcon | 81.81 | 95.65 | 80.24 | 77.28 | 1941 | John Huston |
302 | The Wizard of Oz | 81.77 | 98.03 | 79.38 | 77.17 | 1939 | Victor Fleming |
303 | Le Cercle Rouge | 81.76 | 90.03 | 80.81 | 78.54 | 1970 | Jean-Pierre Melville |
304 | Monsieur Verdoux | 81.76 | 89.80 | 78.55 | 81.34 | 1947 | Charlie Chaplin |
305 | The Return | 81.72 | 84.85 | 80.02 | 80.96 | 2003 | Andrey Zvyagintsev |
306 | Secrets & Lies | 81.71 | 90.73 | 80.29 | 78.66 | 1996 | Mike Leigh |
307 | The Hidden Fortress | 81.70 | 91.25 | 80.79 | 80.72 | 1958 | Akira Kurosawa |
308 | Pan's Labyrinth | 81.69 | 92.59 | 81.60 | 76.08 | 2006 | Guillermo del Toro |
309 | Amélie | 81.69 | 79.64 | 81.96 | 80.27 | 2004 | Jean-Pierre Jeunet |
310 | Ben-Hur | 81.67 | 86.93 | 79.86 | 80.22 | 1959 | William Wyler |
311 | Fitzcarraldo | 81.67 | 75.80 | 81.06 | 81.21 | 1982 | Werner Herzog |
312 | American History X | 81.63 | 70.13 | 83.58 | 83.00 | 1998 | Tony Kaye |
313 | Ace in the Hole | 81.62 | 79.10 | 80.88 | 81.36 | 1951 | Billy Wilder |
314 | Capernaum | 81.62 | 81.83 | 80.52 | 82.18 | 2018 | Nadine Labaki |
315 | Still Walking | 81.61 | 90.30 | 80.92 | 79.48 | 2008 | Hirokazu Koreeda |
316 | All About My Mother | 81.61 | 88.77 | 79.56 | 78.80 | 1999 | Pedro Almodóvar |
317 | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | 81.60 | 92.28 | 78.82 | 78.83 | 1972 | Luis Buñuel |
318 | Platoon | 81.60 | 88.70 | 79.52 | 80.45 | 1986 | Oliver Stone |
319 | Farewell My Concubine | 81.60 | 80.50 | 80.49 | 81.04 | 1993 | Chen Kaige |
320 | Letter from an Unknown Woman | 81.59 | 93.10 | 79.84 | 79.31 | 1948 | Max Ophüls |
321 | The Grand Budapest Hotel | 81.58 | 87.64 | 80.72 | 79.19 | 2014 | Wes Anderson |
322 | The Virgin Spring | 81.58 | 82.45 | 80.70 | 80.66 | 1960 | Ingmar Bergman |
323 | The Red Balloon | 81.57 | 90.20 | 79.93 | 80.30 | 1956 | Albert Lamorisse |
324 | Stagecoach | 81.57 | 94.58 | 77.69 | 78.94 | 1939 | John Ford |
325 | Mulholland Drive | 81.56 | 80.61 | 79.60 | 77.87 | 2001 | David Lynch |
326 | A Matter of Life and Death | 81.49 | 92.60 | 81.91 | 76.27 | 1946 | Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger |
327 | High Noon | 81.48 | 90.58 | 79.27 | 78.94 | 1952 | Fred Zinnemann |
328 | Orpheus | 81.48 | 96.20 | 79.88 | 78.90 | 1950 | Jean Cocteau |
329 | Life of Brian | 81.47 | 82.98 | 80.78 | 79.81 | 1979 | Terry Jones |
330 | Casino | 81.46 | 74.23 | 81.54 | 81.75 | 1995 | Martin Scorsese |
331 | Kagemusha | 81.44 | 82.93 | 80.01 | 80.43 | 1980 | Akira Kurosawa |
332 | Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid | 81.43 | 76.08 | 80.53 | 81.85 | 1969 | George Roy Hill |
333 | In a Lonely Place | 81.43 | 92.45 | 80.42 | 78.77 | 1950 | Nicholas Ray |
334 | Scarface | 81.43 | 71.30 | 81.97 | 82.18 | 1983 | Brian De Palma |
335 | A Short Film About Killing | 81.42 | 87.35 | 79.89 | 80.38 | 1988 | Krzysztof Kieślowski |
336 | Beauty and the Beast | 81.41 | 92.05 | 79.28 | 78.32 | 1946 | Jean Cocteau |
337 | The Hustler | 81.39 | 92.45 | 80.43 | 78.97 | 1961 | Robert Rossen |
338 | Cléo from 5 to 7 | 81.38 | 91.65 | 80.03 | 79.11 | 1962 | Agnès Varda |
339 | Fireworks | 81.37 | 90.15 | 80.01 | 79.63 | 1997 | Takeshi Kitano |
340 | Room | 81.36 | 88.41 | 80.43 | 79.48 | 2015 | Lenny Abrahamson |
341 | Mad Max: Fury Road | 81.35 | 90.39 | 79.76 | 77.80 | 2015 | George Miller |
342 | Steamboat Bill, Jr. | 81.32 | 95.75 | 79.30 | 79.23 | 1928 | Charles Reisner, Buster Keaton |
343 | Judgment at Nuremberg | 81.31 | 71.58 | 82.24 | 83.03 | 1961 | Stanley Kramer |
344 | The Straight Story | 81.30 | 87.15 | 79.64 | 79.88 | 1999 | David Lynch |
345 | Meshes of the Afternoon | 81.29 | 96.25 | 77.91 | 79.99 | 1943 | Maya Deren, Alexandr Hackenschmied |
346 | Alice in the Cities | 81.28 | 86.70 | 79.60 | 80.20 | 1974 | Wim Wenders |
347 | Akira | 81.28 | 80.90 | 81.12 | 79.98 | 1988 | Katsuhiro Otomo |
348 | Good Will Hunting | 81.27 | 79.38 | 81.97 | 81.05 | 1997 | Gus Van Sant |
349 | The Miracle Worker | 81.25 | 85.15 | 78.88 | 81.55 | 1962 | Arthur Penn |
350 | Talk to Her | 81.25 | 87.48 | 79.33 | 78.71 | 2002 | Pedro Almodóvar |
351 | The Graduate | 81.24 | 85.58 | 78.91 | 79.97 | 1967 | Mike Nichols |
352 | Beauty and the Beast | 81.22 | 92.28 | 79.20 | 78.77 | 1991 | Gary Trousdale, Kirk Wise |
353 | The Heiress | 81.19 | 94.45 | 80.20 | 79.76 | 1949 | William Wyler |
354 | Fantasia | 81.18 | 93.03 | 76.76 | 79.95 | 1940 | Samuel Armstrong, James Algar |
355 | Au Revoir les Enfants | 81.18 | 94.25 | 80.14 | 78.92 | 1987 | Louis Malle |
356 | Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri | 81.18 | 88.62 | 79.36 | 79.90 | 2017 | Martin McDonagh |
357 | Inglourious Basterds | 81.17 | 79.05 | 81.06 | 80.51 | 2009 | Quentin Tarantino |
358 | Elevator to the Gallows | 81.16 | 90.45 | 79.31 | 78.56 | 1958 | Louis Malle |
359 | Gladiator | 81.16 | 75.39 | 81.69 | 81.52 | 2000 | Ridley Scott |
360 | Through a Glass Darkly | 81.15 | 93.60 | 81.11 | 78.86 | 1961 | Ingmar Bergman |
361 | Million Dollar Baby | 81.15 | 87.41 | 77.43 | 80.72 | 2004 | Clint Eastwood |
362 | Days of Heaven | 81.15 | 90.75 | 80.19 | 77.08 | 1978 | Terrence Malick |
363 | Do the Right Thing | 81.15 | 90.78 | 80.26 | 77.04 | 1989 | Spike Lee |
364 | Out of the Past | 81.14 | 91.40 | 80.73 | 77.92 | 1947 | Jacques Tourneur |
365 | Strangers on a Train | 81.11 | 93.30 | 80.01 | 78.68 | 1951 | Alfred Hitchcock |
366 | Blue Velvet | 81.11 | 83.48 | 78.98 | 77.09 | 1986 | David Lynch |
367 | That Obscure Object of Desire | 81.09 | 89.40 | 79.59 | 78.11 | 1977 | Luis Buñuel |
368 | What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? | 81.08 | 80.23 | 80.74 | 80.75 | 1962 | Robert Aldrich |
369 | My Night at Maud's | 81.07 | 88.15 | 79.51 | 79.42 | 1969 | Éric Rohmer |
370 | The Earrings of Madame de… | 81.07 | 92.15 | 80.36 | 77.05 | 1953 | Max Ophüls |
371 | The Conversation | 81.04 | 89.23 | 80.03 | 77.44 | 1974 | Francis Ford Coppola |
372 | The Killing | 81.03 | 91.50 | 79.51 | 79.21 | 1956 | Stanley Kubrick |
373 | The Servant | 81.03 | 87.83 | 79.45 | 78.57 | 1963 | Joseph Losey |
374 | The Intouchables | 81.03 | 67.15 | 82.13 | 84.70 | 2011 | Olivier Nakache, Éric Toledano |
375 | The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp | 81.01 | 94.15 | 81.57 | 75.44 | 1943 | Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger |
376 | Jaws | 81.01 | 90.98 | 79.91 | 75.70 | 1975 | Steven Spielberg |
377 | Winter Light | 81.01 | 73.55 | 81.51 | 79.95 | 1963 | Ingmar Bergman |
378 | Love Exposure | 81.01 | 80.88 | 82.23 | 79.55 | 2008 | Sion Sono |
379 | Hiroshima Mon Amour | 81.00 | 92.95 | 80.13 | 77.99 | 1959 | Alain Resnais |
380 | Day for Night | 80.98 | 92.55 | 80.21 | 78.27 | 1973 | François Truffaut |
381 | Ratatouille | 80.97 | 92.73 | 78.72 | 78.68 | 2007 | Brad Bird |
382 | Ghost in the Shell | 80.97 | 81.43 | 79.98 | 81.15 | 1995 | Mamoru Oshii |
383 | Germany Year Zero | 80.95 | 92.00 | 77.80 | 80.03 | 1948 | Roberto Rossellini |
384 | Spotlight | 80.93 | 93.00 | 79.75 | 77.55 | 2015 | Tom McCarthy |
385 | Die Hard | 80.93 | 79.58 | 81.11 | 79.43 | 1988 | John McTiernan |
386 | Laura | 80.93 | 93.80 | 79.70 | 78.47 | 1944 | Otto Preminger |
387 | Sleuth | 80.93 | 89.95 | 79.16 | 80.87 | 1972 | Joseph L. Mankiewicz |
388 | The Diving Bell and the Butterfly | 80.92 | 88.64 | 79.69 | 77.84 | 2007 | Julian Schnabel |
389 | The Handmaiden | 80.92 | 85.99 | 82.55 | 77.41 | 2016 | Park Chan-wook |
390 | Stand by Me | 80.90 | 80.20 | 81.28 | 79.54 | 1986 | Rob Reiner |
391 | Wolf Children | 80.90 | 80.15 | 80.40 | 81.27 | 2012 | Mamoru Hosoda |
392 | Marriage Story | 80.88 | 92.86 | 79.40 | 77.75 | 2019 | Noam Baumbach |
393 | Shoeshine | 80.87 | 93.75 | 79.02 | 79.38 | 1946 | Vittorio De Sica |
394 | Freaks | 80.85 | 84.70 | 77.66 | 80.31 | 1932 | Tod Browning |
395 | Nosferatu | 80.85 | 93.75 | 78.29 | 79.14 | 1922 | F. W. Murnau |
396 | Dial M for Murder | 80.84 | 77.60 | 81.17 | 81.31 | 1954 | Alfred Hitchcock |
397 | Amour | 80.81 | 90.90 | 77.74 | 78.19 | 2012 | Michael Haneke |
398 | 12 Years a Slave | 80.80 | 94.00 | 79.74 | 76.94 | 2013 | Steve McQueen |
399 | The Nightmare Before Christmas | 80.77 | 85.38 | 79.26 | 79.69 | 1993 | Henry Selick |
400 | Cabaret | 80.77 | 84.68 | 77.34 | 80.69 | 1972 | Bob Fosse |
401 | Central Station | 80.77 | 83.28 | 80.91 | 78.52 | 1998 | Walter Salles |
402 | Landscape in the Mist | 80.74 | 71.35 | 80.76 | 80.28 | 1988 | Theo Angelopoulos |
403 | 1917 | 80.73 | 84.37 | 80.65 | 79.33 | 2019 | Sam Mendes |
404 | Intolerance: Love's Struggle Throughout the Ages | 80.71 | 93.98 | 75.69 | 78.01 | 1916 | D. W. Griffith |
405 | Call Me by Your Name | 80.71 | 91.25 | 79.43 | 77.87 | 2017 | Luca Guadagnino |
406 | Midnight Cowboy | 80.71 | 82.98 | 79.10 | 79.50 | 1969 | John Schlesinger |
407 | Shadow of a Doubt | 80.70 | 94.38 | 79.31 | 76.04 | 1943 | Alfred Hitchcock |
408 | Interstellar | 80.70 | 74.16 | 81.30 | 82.25 | 2014 | Christopher Nolan |
409 | Hannah and Her Sisters | 80.69 | 88.95 | 79.15 | 77.98 | 1986 | Woody Allen |
410 | Monsters, Inc. | 80.68 | 85.29 | 79.37 | 80.08 | 2001 | Pete Docter, David Silverman |
411 | The Testament of Dr. Mabuse | 80.65 | 85.85 | 79.40 | 79.38 | 1933 | Fritz Lang |
412 | Downfall | 80.64 | 83.53 | 81.54 | 78.55 | 2004 | Oliver Hirschbiegel |
413 | Being There | 80.64 | 87.30 | 79.42 | 78.06 | 1979 | Hal Ashby |
414 | The Killer | 80.63 | 92.60 | 79.27 | 78.66 | 1989 | John Woo |
415 | My Left Foot: The Story of Christy Brown | 80.63 | 93.23 | 78.13 | 79.15 | 1989 | Jim Sheridan |
416 | Jean de Florette | 80.60 | 88.40 | 80.18 | 79.69 | 1986 | Claude Berri |
417 | The Big Lebowski | 80.57 | 74.80 | 82.28 | 78.57 | 1998 | Coen Brothers |
418 | The King's Speech | 80.57 | 90.86 | 78.50 | 78.59 | 2010 | Tom Hooper |
419 | Whisper of the Heart | 80.55 | 79.98 | 80.80 | 80.31 | 1995 | Yoshifumi Kondō |
420 | E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial | 80.54 | 93.08 | 77.22 | 77.82 | 1982 | Steven Spielberg |
421 | Infernal Affairs | 80.54 | 79.83 | 79.92 | 80.22 | 2002 | Andrew Lau, Alan Mak |
422 | The Prestige | 80.54 | 72.22 | 82.71 | 81.38 | 2006 | Christopher Nolan |
423 | Our Hospitality | 80.54 | 92.85 | 77.72 | 79.58 | 1923 | Buster Keaton, John G. Blystone |
424 | Zootopia | 80.53 | 85.22 | 78.84 | 80.18 | 2016 | Byron Howard, Rich Moore |
425 | Toy Story 2 | 80.49 | 92.59 | 78.51 | 77.05 | 1999 | John Lasseter, Ash Brannon, Lee Unkrich |
426 | Klaus | 80.48 | 75.00 | 81.07 | 81.41 | 2019 | Sergio Pablos |
427 | The Big Sleep | 80.45 | 92.10 | 79.74 | 77.58 | 1946 | Howard Hawks |
428 | Ford v Ferrari | 80.45 | 83.94 | 79.37 | 80.01 | 2019 | James Mangold |
429 | Dead Poets Society | 80.44 | 78.70 | 79.43 | 80.75 | 1989 | Peter Weir |
430 | The Terminator | 80.43 | 89.08 | 78.26 | 78.13 | 1984 | James Cameron |
431 | Naked | 80.43 | 84.48 | 80.39 | 77.34 | 1993 | Mike Leigh |
432 | Dangal | 80.41 | 83.00 | 79.68 | 80.56 | 2016 | Nitesh Tiwari |
433 | Kwaidan | 80.40 | 81.80 | 79.75 | 79.42 | 1964 | Masaki Kobayashi |
434 | The Man Who Would Be King | 80.40 | 90.55 | 78.24 | 77.79 | 1975 | John Huston |
435 | Wild Tales | 80.38 | 82.57 | 80.48 | 79.22 | 2014 | Damián Szifron |
436 | Groundhog Day | 80.38 | 80.08 | 79.31 | 79.35 | 1993 | Harold Ramis |
437 | Catch Me If You Can | 80.38 | 83.44 | 78.74 | 80.57 | 2002 | Steven Spielberg |
438 | I Vitelloni | 80.36 | 90.28 | 77.64 | 78.06 | 1953 | Federico Fellini |
439 | The Big Heat | 80.35 | 92.90 | 79.27 | 77.87 | 1953 | Fritz Lang |
440 | The Double Life of Véronique | 80.35 | 82.63 | 80.19 | 77.87 | 1991 | Krzysztof Kieślowski |
441 | Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? | 80.35 | 82.58 | 80.19 | 78.43 | 1966 | Mike Nichols |
442 | Requiem for a Dream | 80.33 | 71.39 | 81.39 | 80.93 | 2000 | Darren Aronofsky |
443 | Rope | 80.33 | 79.20 | 80.31 | 79.30 | 1948 | Alfred Hitchcock |
444 | Love and Death | 80.33 | 89.83 | 77.55 | 78.50 | 1975 | Woody Allen |
445 | The Remains of the Day | 80.29 | 86.88 | 78.75 | 78.80 | 1993 | James Ivory |
446 | Jules and Jim | 80.28 | 93.70 | 78.30 | 77.94 | 1962 | François Truffaut |
447 | The Gospel According to Matthew | 80.28 | 88.30 | 76.50 | 78.52 | 1964 | Pier Paolo Pasolini |
448 | How to Train Your Dragon | 80.27 | 81.97 | 79.45 | 80.24 | 2010 | Chris Sanders, Dean DeBlois |
449 | Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 | 80.27 | 88.50 | 78.81 | 78.53 | 2011 | David Yates |
450 | Cat on a Hot Tin Roof | 80.26 | 87.05 | 79.46 | 79.79 | 1958 | Richard Brooks |
451 | The French Connection | 80.26 | 93.35 | 78.04 | 76.89 | 1971 | William Friedkin |
452 | Opening Night | 80.25 | 78.05 | 80.50 | 79.25 | 1977 | John Cassavetes |
453 | Hotel Rwanda | 80.24 | 84.54 | 79.34 | 79.40 | 2004 | Terry George |
454 | 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days | 80.22 | 92.51 | 77.76 | 76.22 | 2007 | Cristian Mungiu |
455 | Tampopo | 80.22 | 92.40 | 81.20 | 77.01 | 1985 | Juzo Itami |
456 | Scarface | 80.22 | 93.50 | 76.43 | 79.55 | 1932 | Howard Hawks, Howard Hughes |
457 | The Face of Another | 80.21 | 87.50 | 79.61 | 79.34 | 1966 | Hiroshi Teshigahara |
458 | The Roaring Twenties | 80.21 | 86.20 | 77.79 | 80.68 | 1939 | Raoul Walsh |
459 | Pickpocket | 80.20 | 93.80 | 76.41 | 76.47 | 1959 | Robert Bresson |
460 | Kiki's Delivery Service | 80.20 | 85.45 | 79.87 | 78.84 | 1989 | Hayao Miyazaki |
461 | A Prophet | 80.19 | 89.61 | 79.53 | 76.14 | 2009 | Jacques Audiard |
462 | Zelig | 80.19 | 90.00 | 76.50 | 80.29 | 1983 | Woody Allen |
463 | Trouble in Paradise | 80.18 | 88.20 | 79.35 | 77.62 | 1932 | Ernst Lubitsch |
464 | Gran Torino | 80.17 | 76.27 | 78.57 | 82.36 | 2008 | Clint Eastwood |
465 | Last Year at Marienbad | 80.16 | 88.25 | 78.29 | 77.37 | 1961 | Alain Resnais |
466 | All the President's Men | 80.15 | 85.95 | 80.48 | 76.46 | 1976 | Alan J. Pakula |
467 | Breaking the Waves | 80.15 | 79.85 | 78.46 | 79.55 | 1996 | Lars von Trier |
468 | Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade | 80.14 | 74.28 | 81.44 | 80.57 | 1989 | Steven Spielberg |
469 | Divorce Italian Style | 80.12 | 91.00 | 79.28 | 78.26 | 1961 | Pietro Germi |
470 | Edward Scissorhands | 80.12 | 78.65 | 78.09 | 80.73 | 1990 | Tim Burton |
471 | The Thing | 80.12 | 67.98 | 82.60 | 79.34 | 1982 | John Carpenter |
472 | Perfect Blue | 80.11 | 74.05 | 80.91 | 80.09 | 1997 | Satoshi Kon |
473 | Down by Law | 80.10 | 79.03 | 78.98 | 79.61 | 1986 | Jim Jarmusch |
474 | Bringing Up Baby | 80.10 | 90.75 | 78.25 | 76.45 | 1938 | Howard Hawks |
475 | The Phantom of Liberty | 80.09 | 85.10 | 78.89 | 78.66 | 1974 | Luis Buñuel |
476 | Bonnie and Clyde | 80.07 | 85.38 | 78.16 | 78.23 | 1967 | Arthur Penn |
477 | The Incredibles | 80.07 | 89.69 | 79.77 | 75.78 | 2004 | Brad Bird |
478 | Rocky | 80.04 | 79.73 | 79.17 | 79.29 | 1976 | John G. Avildsen |
479 | His Girl Friday | 80.03 | 94.15 | 79.24 | 76.72 | 1940 | Howard Hawks |
480 | Mommy | 80.03 | 80.79 | 80.39 | 79.13 | 2014 | Xavier Dolan |
481 | Mon Oncle | 80.03 | 88.00 | 78.03 | 78.76 | 1958 | Jacques Tati |
482 | My Fair Lady | 79.99 | 91.85 | 77.53 | 78.00 | 1964 | George Cukor |
483 | Charade | 79.98 | 85.55 | 79.37 | 78.72 | 1963 | Stanley Donen |
484 | Stalag 17 | 79.95 | 87.13 | 79.62 | 77.79 | 1953 | Billy Wilder |
485 | Boyhood | 79.95 | 97.08 | 76.08 | 75.95 | 2014 | Richard Linklater |
486 | The Secret in Their Eyes | 79.95 | 82.49 | 81.27 | 77.67 | 2009 | Juan José Campanella |
487 | Ninotchka | 79.95 | 90.15 | 77.99 | 78.50 | 1939 | Ernst Lubitsch |
488 | Pierrot le Fou | 79.94 | 81.75 | 77.84 | 76.65 | 1965 | Jean-Luc Godard |
489 | The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser | 79.94 | 89.10 | 78.30 | 78.27 | 1974 | Werner Herzog |
490 | Stroszek | 79.94 | 88.40 | 79.50 | 77.77 | 1977 | Werner Herzog |
491 | A Hard Day's Night | 79.93 | 93.73 | 76.82 | 77.08 | 1964 | Richard Lester |
492 | Onibaba | 79.90 | 74.75 | 79.42 | 79.96 | 1964 | Kaneto Shindo |
493 | Repulsion | 79.85 | 92.68 | 77.29 | 76.57 | 1965 | Roman Polanski |
494 | Like Stars on Earth | 79.85 | 80.50 | 79.54 | 79.86 | 2007 | Aamir Khan, Amole Gupte |
495 | Duck Soup | 79.84 | 92.33 | 79.01 | 74.92 | 1933 | Leo McCarey |
496 | Carlito's Way | 79.83 | 70.28 | 79.16 | 82.01 | 1993 | Brian De Palma |
497 | Nashville | 79.82 | 93.23 | 76.89 | 74.92 | 1975 | Robert Altman |
498 | The Triplets of Belleville | 79.82 | 88.97 | 76.57 | 78.66 | 2003 | Sylvain Chomet |
499 | Dr. Mabuse the Gambler | 79.81 | 85.10 | 76.88 | 79.98 | 1922 | Fritz Lang |
500 | Gone Girl | 79.79 | 83.03 | 79.32 | 78.87 | 2014 | David Fincher |
If you found this list interesting, I would really appreciate it if you can give my newish
Youtube channel a subscribe. It would mean a lot. As always, if you know of or use any other movie website, definitely let me know. Thanks guys.
submitted by ReelStats to movies [link] [comments]
casino in city of commerce video
A map showing casinos and other gaming facilities located near Commerce Casino, located in Commerce at 6131 Telegraph Road, in California, United States. Casino City Home World Gambling American Gambling Californian Gambling Parks & Recreation Student/Athlete Highlight featuring: Casey Barragan 綠. The Department of Parks & Recreation is proud to highlight high school senior Casey Barragan, member of the City of Commerce Women’s Water Polo team who has committed to continue her education at Fresno State University as a member of the Women’s Water Polo Team. The #1 Casino & Hotel in LA Where the game reigns. Experience the best action in LA at The Commerce Casino & Hotel, SoCal's #1 home for games of skill. There's always a seat at the table for players of all levels, with the widest variety of table and casino card games around. Meetings and Events Whether you're hosting 10 guests or 1,000, The Commerce Casino & Hotel will make your next event an affair to remember. The Commerce Casino & Hotel offers more than 20,000 sq. ft. of unobstructed, flexible space for events of any size, from meetings to weddings to conferences. Choices in Los Angeles area are few. Bicycle Casino or Commerce Casino. I agree with prior reviewer, Commerce does not care about its guests. The floor pesons are rude and arrogant. They just don't care because the place is very popular and busy with dealers and other guests who don't care and are for the most part rude and arrogant. … Casino City is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Warning: You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a Casino or placing a wager. There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the world with Internet access and hundreds of different games and gambling ... COVID update: Commerce Casino has updated their hours, takeout & delivery options. 335 reviews of Commerce Casino "I've had some great nights with some buddies over $1/$2 Texas Hold'em. No frills, but a close drive from most of LA." COMMERCE, California -- (PRESS RELEASE) -- If you're a little short of cash to secure your $10,000 seat in Commerce Casino's 2011 LA Poker Classic Main Event, don't give up your dreams of winning the million-dollar payday and having your name enshrined with such poker luminaries as Gus Hansen, Antonio Esfandiari, Michael Mizrachi and Phil Ivey. ... Commerce Casino is in Commerce, California and is open daily 24 hours. The card room's 90,000 square foot gaming space features 270 table and poker games. The property has seven restaurants and a hotel with 200 rooms. The City of Commerce says 200 employees have been furloughed and the Commerce Casino has laid off 800 workers. Not to mention the millions in revenue that have been lost, which the cities will ...
casino in city of commerce top
[index]
[2646] [2915] [6328] [6604] [960] [9560] [8473] [3425] [4050] [4156]
casino in city of commerce
Copyright © 2024 m.pinupcasinoz.site